Multiple Paths to Effective National Evaluation Societies
- 30 August 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Journal of Evaluation
- Vol. 34 (4) , 519-544
Abstract
National Evaluation Societies (NES) are situated at the intersection between Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) supply and demand. To date, little research has explored NES and their potential for strengthening national M&E. This study addresses this gap, examining perceived NES performance relevant to organizational and policy-oriented goals while identifying factors related to that performance. The study draws upon data from a survey of 40 NES in 37 low- and middle-income countries. Qualitative Comparative Analysis identifies multiple pathways to well-performing NES and focuses on the interplay between the context in which evaluation societies operate and their organizational characteristics. The findings underline the importance of political openness while also demonstrating that some NES manage to perform well even in challenging political environments.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Unpacking Black Boxes: Mechanisms and Theory Building in EvaluationAmerican Journal of Evaluation, 2010
- Realistic Evaluation and QCAEvaluation, 2007
- The Organizational Structure of Local EnvironmentalismMobilization: An International Quarterly, 2005
- Advocacy Organizations in the U.S. Political ProcessAnnual Review of Sociology, 2004
- Resources and Social Movement Mobilization2004
- Research Methods and Organization Studies2003
- Organizational Capacity and Organizational Effectiveness among Street-Level Food Assistance ProgramsNonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2002
- The Outcomes of Homeless Mobilization: The Influence of Organization, Disruption, Political Mediation, and FramingAmerican Journal of Sociology, 2000
- NGO Performance – What Breeds Success? New Evidence from South AsiaWorld Development, 1999
- Mobilization at the Margins: Resources, Benefactors, and the Viability of Homeless Social Movement OrganizationsAmerican Sociological Review, 1996