Memorability of pre-designed and user-defined gesture sets
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 27 April 2013
- conference paper
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 1099-1108
Abstract
We studied the memorability of free-form gesture sets for invoking actions. We compared three types of gesture sets: user-defined gesture sets, gesture sets designed by the authors, and random gesture sets in three studies with 33 participants in total. We found that user-defined gestures are easier to remember, both immediately after creation and on the next day (up to a 24% difference in recall rate compared to pre-designed gestures). We also discovered that the differences between gesture sets are mostly due to association errors (rather than gesture form errors), that participants prefer user-defined sets, and that they think user-defined gestures take less time to learn. Finally, we contribute a qualitative analysis of the tradeoffs involved in gesture type selection and share our data and a video corpus of 66 gestures for replicability and further analysis.PostprintPostprinKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- The challenges and potential of end-user gesture customization2013
- Proton2012
- Studying user-defined iPad gestures for interaction in multi-display environment2012
- AirStroke2011
- User-defined motion gestures for mobile interaction2011
- Using strokes as command shortcuts2009
- GestureBar2009
- User-defined gestures for surface computing2009
- Understanding Multi-touch Manipulation for Surface Computing2009
- CharadeCommunications of the ACM, 1993