High self-assessment of disability and the surgeon's recommendation against surgical intervention may negatively impact satisfaction scores in patients with spinal disorders
Authors:
- 1 June 2015
- journal article
- Published by Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG) in Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine
- Vol. 22 (6) , 666-671
Abstract
OBJECT: Patient satisfaction scores have become a common metric for health care quality. Because satisfaction scores are right-skewed, even small differences in mean scores can have a large impact. Little information, however, is available on the specific factors that play a role in satisfaction in patients with spinal disorders. The authors investigated whether disability severity and the surgeon's recommendation for or against surgical intervention were associated with patient satisfaction scores. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study involving adult patients who were referred to a spine surgeon for an outpatient evaluation of back pain. Patients completed the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) before their clinic appointment and a Press Ganey patient satisfaction survey after their visit. Patients were grouped by self-assessed disability severity: mild to moderate (ODI < 40%) and severe (≥ 40%). Satisfaction scores were graded from 0 (very poor) to 100 (very good). Nonparametric tests were used to evaluate the association between patient satisfaction and current disability self-assessment. The authors also investigated whether the surgeon's recommendation against surgery negatively affected patient satisfaction. RESULTS: One hundred thirty patients completed the ODI questionnaire before and satisfaction surveys after seeing a spine surgeon for a new outpatient back pain consultation. Of these, 68 patients had severe disability, 62 had mild to moderate disability, 67 received a recommendation for surgery, and 63 received a recommendation against surgery. Composite satisfaction scores were lower among patients who had severe disability than among those with mild to moderate disability (median [interquartile range]: 91.7 [83.7–96.4] vs 95.8 [91.0–99.3], respectively; p = 0.0040). Patients who received a recommendation against surgery reported lower satisfaction scores than those who received a recommendation for surgery (91.7 [83.5–95.8] vs 95.8 [88.5–99.8]; p = 0.0059). CONCLUSIONS: High self-assessment of disability and a surgeon's recommendation against surgical intervention are associated with lower satisfaction scores in patients with spinal disorders.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Structure, process or outcome: which contributes most to patients' overall assessment of healthcare quality?BMJ Quality & Safety, 2011
- Illness and Satisfaction With Medical CareCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 1999
- Patient Satisfaction with the General PractitionerMedical Care, 1998
- Age and health status in a patient satisfaction surveySocial Science & Medicine, 1996
- Compensation, Work Status, and Disability in Low Back Pain PatientsSpine, 1995
- Older Patients?? Health Status and Satisfaction With Medical Care in an HMO PopulationMedical Care, 1990
- Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: A meta-analysisSocial Science & Medicine, 1990
- Patient satisfaction in primary health care: A literature review and analysisEvaluation and Program Planning, 1983
- Social psychological determinants of patient satisfaction: A test of five hypothesesSocial Science & Medicine, 1982
- Toward a theory of patient satisfactionSocial Science & Medicine, 1982