Chemoradiation vs. local excision in the management of early squamous cell carcinoma of the anus: a systematic review
- 24 August 2022
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Colorectal Disease
- Vol. 37 (9) , 1937-1944
Abstract
Purpose Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) suffers a constant increase each year in the last decades. Recent studies suggested the possibility of local excision (LE) as an option for early-stage SCAC patients. This systematic review aims to summarize the available evidence on the comparison of LE vs. chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in the treatment of early SCCA patients. Methods We conducted a literature review including MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews through June 2022. MOOSE guidelines were followed. We used the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) tool to assess quality. Data on survival and procedure-associated costs were extracted. Results Four retrospective studies including 3323 patients were included. They were all comparative retrospective cohort studies (three were registry-based studies, either NCDB or SEER) with a MINORS score of 16–19 points. Overall survival (OS) was comparable between LE and CRT patients in three studies, with a 5-year OS of 85.3–100% in LE patients and 85–91.6% in CRT patients. One study investigated cancer-specific survival (CSS) and reported similar 5-year CSS in LE (98%) and CRT patients (96%). One investigated progression-free survival (PFS) and did not report any statistically significant difference in 5-year PFS between LE (91%) and CRT patients (83%). Only one study considered the mean costs associated with the two approaches (29,210 USD with LE and 46,350 USD with CRT). Conclusions LE may potentially be considered a valid alternative to CRT for patients with early-stage SCAA. Results of prospective randomized long-term trials comparing LE with CRT are warranted to draw definitive conclusions and consider LE as a true cost-effective strategy for T1N0 SCCA with similar oncologic results offered by CRT, which—to date—remains the “gold standard.” PROSPERO registration CRD42022338750Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predictive Factors for Early and Late Local Toxicities in Anal Cancer Treated by Radiotherapy in Combination With or Without ChemotherapyDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2013
- Changing Patterns of Anal Canal Carcinoma in the United StatesJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2013
- Long-Term Update of US GI Intergroup RTOG 98-11 Phase III Trial for Anal Carcinoma: Survival, Relapse, and Colostomy Failure With Concurrent Chemoradiation Involving Fluorouracil/Mitomycin Versus Fluorouracil/CisplatinJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2012
- Induction Chemotherapy and Dose Intensification of the Radiation Boost in Locally Advanced Anal Canal Carcinoma: Final Analysis of the Randomized UNICANCER ACCORD 03 TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2012
- Chemoradiation for the treatment of epidermoid anal cancer: 13-year follow-up of the first randomised UKCCCR Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I)British Journal of Cancer, 2010
- A multi-institutional acute gastrointestinal toxicity analysis of anal cancer patients treated with concurrent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and chemotherapyRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2009
- Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in EpidemiologyA Proposal for ReportingJAMA, 2000
- Epidermoid anal cancer: results from the UKCCCR randomised trial of radiotherapy alone versus radiotherapy, 5-fluorouracil, and mitomycinThe Lancet, 1996
- Cancer of the anal canalCurrent Problems in Cancer, 1980
- Combined therapy for cancer of the anal canalDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1974