A hybrid three-class brain–computer interface system utilizing SSSEPs and transient ERPs
- 27 October 2016
- journal article
- Published by IOP Publishing in Journal of Neural Engineering
- Vol. 13 (6) , 066015
Abstract
Objective. This paper investigates the fusion of steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials (SSSEPs) and transient event-related potentials (tERPs), evoked through tactile simulation on the left and right-hand fingertips, in a three-class EEG based hybrid brain–computer interface. It was hypothesized, that fusing the input signals leads to higher classification rates than classifying tERP and SSSEP individually. Approach. Fourteen subjects participated in the studies, consisting of a screening paradigm to determine person dependent resonance-like frequencies and a subsequent online paradigm. The whole setup of the BCI system was based on open interfaces, following suggestions for a common implementation platform. During the online experiment, subjects were instructed to focus their attention on the stimulated fingertips as indicated by a visual cue. The recorded data were classified during runtime using a multi-class shrinkage LDA classifier and the outputs were fused together applying a posterior probability based fusion. Data were further analyzed offline, involving a combined classification of SSSEP and tERP features as a second fusion principle. The final results were tested for statistical significance applying a repeated measures ANOVA. Main results. A significant classification increase was achieved when fusing the results with a combined classification compared to performing an individual classification. Furthermore, the SSSEP classifier was significantly better in detecting a non-control state, whereas the tERP classifier was significantly better in detecting control states. Subjects who had a higher relative band power increase during the screening session also achieved significantly higher classification results than subjects with lower relative band power increase. Significance. It could be shown that utilizing SSSEP and tERP for hBCIs increases the classification accuracy and also that tERP and SSSEP are not classifying control- and non-control states with the same level of accuracy.Keywords
Funding Information
- Seventh Framework Programme (FP7-224631)
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stability and distribution of steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials elicited by vibro-tactile stimulationMedical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2012
- Tools for brain-computer interaction: a general concept for a hybrid BCIFrontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2011
- Transient and steady-state responses to mechanical stimulation of different fingers reveal interactions based on lateral inhibitionClinical Neurophysiology, 2010
- Self-Paced Operation of an SSVEP-Based Orthosis With and Without an Imagery-Based “Brain Switch:” A Feasibility Study Towards a Hybrid BCIIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2010
- A tactile P300 brain-computer interfaceFrontiers in Neuroscience, 2010
- Mu rhythm (de)synchronization and EEG single-trial classification of different motor imagery tasksNeuroImage, 2006
- Steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials: suitable brain signals for brain-computer interfaces?IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2006
- Brain–computer interfaces for communication and controlClinical Neurophysiology, 2002
- Steady-state vibration somatosensory evoked potentials: physiological characteristics and tuning functionClinical Neurophysiology, 1999
- Steady-state vibration evoked potentials: description of technique and characterization of responsesElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1992