Metallic Dental Implants Wear Mechanisms, Materials, and Manufacturing Processes: A Literature Review
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
Abstract
Objectives: From the treatment of damaged teeth to replacing missing teeth, dental biomaterials cover the scientific interest of many fields. Dental biomaterials are one of the implants whose effective life depends vastly on their material and manufacturing techniques. The purpose of this review is to summarize the important aspects for metallic dental implants from biomedical, mechanical and materials science perspectives. The review article will focus on five major aspects as mentioned below. Tooth anatomy: Maximizing the implant performance depends on proper understanding of human tooth anatomy and the failure behavior of the implants. Major parts from tooth anatomy including saliva characteristics are explored in this section. Wear mechanisms: The prominent wear mechanisms having a high impact on dental wear are abrasive, adhesive, fatigue and corrosion wear. To imitate the physiological working condition of dental implants, reports on the broad range of mastication force and various composition of artificial saliva have been included in this section, which can affect the tribo-corrosion behavior of dental implants. Dental implants classifications: The review paper includes a dedicated discussion on major dental implants types and their details for better understanding their applicability and characteristics. Implant materials: As of today, the most established dental implant materials are SS316L, cobalt chrome alloy and titanium. Detailed discussion on their material properties, microstructures, phase transformations and chemical compositions have been discussed here. Manufacturing techniques: In terms of different production methods, the lost wax casting method as traditional manufacturing is considered. Selective Laser Melting (SLM) and Directed Energy Deposition (DED) as additive manufacturing techniques (AM) have been discussed. For AM, the relationships between process–property–performance details have been explored briefly. The effectiveness of different manufacturing techniques was compared based on porosity distribution, mechanical and biomechanical properties. Summary: Despite having substantial research available on dental implants, there is a lack of systematic reviews to present a holistic viewpoint combining state-of-the-art from biomedical, mechanical, materials science and manufacturing perspectives. This review article attempts to combine a wide variety of analyzing approaches from those interdisciplinary fields to deliver deeper insights to researchers both in academia and industry to develop next-generation dental implants.Keywords
This publication has 189 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Review of Titanium Zirconium (TiZr) Alloys for Use in Endosseous Dental ImplantsMaterials, 2012
- Understanding dental wearJournal of Dentofacial Anomalies and Orthodontics, 2012
- Status of surface treatment in endosseous implant: A literary overviewIndian Journal of Dental Research, 2010
- Influence of artificial saliva on abrasive wear and microhardness of dental composites filled with nanoparticlesJournal of Dentistry, 2008
- Titanium allergy in dental implant patients: a clinical study on 1500 consecutive patientsClinical Oral Implants Research, 2008
- Mechanical and tribological characterization of human toothMaterials Characterization, 2008
- The effect of prism orientation on the indentation testing of human molar enamelArchives of Oral Biology, 2007
- Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshopJournal of Dentistry, 1996
- Study of corrosion between a titanium implant and dental alloysJournal of Dentistry, 1994
- Wear in dentistry—current terminologyJournal of Dentistry, 1992