When should doppler-determined valve area be better than the Gorlin formula?: Variation in hydraulic constants in low flow states
Authors:
- Jerome SegalJSJerome Segal
- Daniel J. LernerDLDaniel J. Lerner
- D. Craig MillerDMD. Craig Miller
- R. Scott MitchellRMR. Scott Mitchell
- Edwin A. AldermanEAEdwin A. Alderman
- Richard L. PoppRPRichard L. Popp
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hydraulic estimation of stenotic orifice area: a correction of the Gorlin formula.Circulation, 1985
- Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.Heart, 1980
- Hemodynamic factors that affect calculated orifice areas in the mitral hancock xenograft valve.Circulation, 1980
- Determination of Effective Orifice Area in Mitral Stenosis from Non‐invasive Ultrasound Doppler Data and Mitral Flow RateActa Medica Scandinavica, 1977
- Echocardiographic evaluation of the stent mounted aortic bioprosthetic valve in the mitral position. In vitro and in vivo studies.Circulation, 1976
- The fluid mechanics of aortic stenosis—II. Unsteady flow experimentsJournal of Biomechanics, 1976
- The fluid mechanics of aortic stenosis—I. Theory and steady flow experimentsJournal of Biomechanics, 1976
- Velocity distribution in aortic flowCardiovascular Research, 1973
- Revision of Gorlin constant for calculation of mitral valve area from left heart pressures.Heart, 1973
- Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. IAmerican Heart Journal, 1951