Antidepressant treatment for postnatal depression
Authors:
- 13 February 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Vol. 2021 (2) , CD013560
Abstract
Background Depression is one of the most common morbidities of the postnatal period. It has been associated with adverse outcomes for women, children, the wider family and society as a whole. Treatment is with psychosocial interventions or antidepressant medication, or both. The aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of different antidepressants and to compare their effectiveness with placebo, treatment as usual or other forms of treatment. This is an update of a review last published in 2014. Objectives To assess the effectiveness and safety of antidepressant drugs in comparison with any other treatment (psychological, psychosocial, or pharmacological), placebo, or treatment as usual for postnatal depression. Search methods We searched Cochrane Common Mental Disorders's Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO in May 2020. We also searched international trials registries and contacted experts in the field. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of women with depression during the first 12 months postpartum that compared antidepressant treatment (alone or in combination with another treatment) with any other treatment, placebo or treatment as usual. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently extracted data from the study reports. We requested missing information from study authors wherever possible. We sought data to allow an intention‐to‐treat analysis. Where we identified sufficient comparable studies we pooled data and conducted random‐effects meta‐analyses. Main results We identified 11 RCTs (1016 women), the majority of which were from English‐speaking, high‐income countries; two were from middle‐income countries. Women were recruited from a mix of community‐based, primary care, maternity and outpatient settings. Most studies used selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), with treatment duration ranging from 4 to 12 weeks. Meta‐analysis showed that there may be a benefit of SSRIs over placebo in response (55% versus 43%; pooled risk ratio (RR) 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97 to 1.66); remission (42% versus 27%; RR 1.54, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.41); and reduced depressive symptoms (standardised mean difference (SMD) −0.30, 95% CI −0.55 to −0.05; 4 studies, 251 women), at 5 to 12 weeks' follow‐up. We were unable to conduct meta‐analysis for adverse events due to variation in the reporting of this between studies. There was no evidence of a difference between acceptability of SSRI and placebo (27% versus 27%; RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.64; 4 studies; 233 women). The certainty of all the evidence for SSRIs was low or very low due to the small number of included studies and a number of potential sources of bias, including high rates of attrition. There was insufficient evidence to assess the efficacy of SSRIs compared with other classes of antidepressants and of antidepressants compared with other pharmacological interventions, complementary medicines, psychological and psychosocial interventions or treatment as usual. A substantial proportion of women experienced adverse effects but there was no evidence of differences in the number of adverse effects between treatment groups in any of the studies. Data on effects on children, including breastfed infants, parenting, and the wider family were limited, although no adverse effects were noted. Authors' conclusions There remains limited evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of antidepressants in the management of postnatal depression, particularly for those with more severe depression. We found low‐certainty evidence that SSRI antidepressants may be more effective in treating postnatal depression than placebo as measured by response and remission rates. However, the low certainty of the evidence suggests that further research is very likely to have an important impact on our effect estimate. There is a continued imperative to better understand whether, and for whom, antidepressants or other treatments are more effective for postnatal depression, and whether some antidepressants are more effective or better tolerated than others. In clinical practice, the findings of this review need to be contextualised by the extensive broader literature on antidepressants in the general population and perinatal clinical guidance, to inform an individualised risk‐benefit clinical decision. Future RCTs should focus on larger samples, longer follow‐up, comparisons with alternative treatment modalities and inclusion of child and parenting outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 77 references indexed in Scilit:
- The prevalence of suicidal ideation identified by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in postpartum women in primary care: findings from the RESPOND trialBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2011
- The Marcé International Society International Biennial General Scientific MeetingArchives of Women's Mental Health, 2011
- Disclosure of symptoms of postnatal depression, the perspectives of health professionals and women: a qualitative studyBMC Family Practice, 2009
- Meta‐analysis of skewed data: Combining results reported on log‐transformed or raw scalesStatistics in Medicine, 2008
- Psychosocial and psychological interventions for treating postpartum depressionCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2007
- Postpartum DepressionJournal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2006
- Perinatal DepressionObstetrics & Gynecology, 2005
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992
- Detection of Postnatal DepressionThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1987