A flexible theory for the dynamics of social populations: Within‐group density dependence and between‐group processes
Authors:
- 16 April 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Ecological Monographs
- Vol. 94 (2)
Abstract
Despite the importance of population structures throughout ecology, relatively little theoretical attention has been paid to understanding the implications of social groups for population dynamics. The dynamics of socially structured populations differ substantially from those of unstructured or metapopulation‐structured populations, because social groups themselves may split, fuse, and compete. These “between‐group processes” remain understudied as drivers of the dynamics of socially structured populations. Here, we explore the role of various between‐group processes in the dynamics of socially structured populations. To do so, we analyze a model that includes births, deaths, migration, fissions, fusions, and between‐group competition and flexibly allows for density dependence in each process. Both logistic growth and an Allee effect are considered for within‐group density dependence. We show that the effect of various between‐group processes is mediated by their influence on the stable distribution of group sizes, with the ultimate impact on the population determined by the interaction between within‐group density dependence and the process's effect on the group size distribution. Between‐group interactions that change the number of groups can lead to both negative and positive density dependence at the global population level (even if birth and death rates depend only on group size and not population size). We conclude with a series of case studies that illustrates different ways that age, sex, and class structure impact the dynamics of social populations. These case studies demonstrate the importance of group‐formation mechanisms, the cost of having excess males in a group, and the potential drawbacks of generating too many reproductive individuals. In sum, our results make clear the importance of within‐group density dependence, between‐group dynamics, and the interactions between them for the population dynamics of social species and provide a flexible framework for modeling social populations.Keywords
This publication has 110 references indexed in Scilit:
- Connecting local and regional scales with stochastic metacommunity models: Competition, ecological drift, and dispersalEcological Monographs, 2023
- Density‐dependent dispersal strategies in a cooperative breederEcology, 2018
- Animal social networks: an introductionBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2009
- Between-group contest competition for food in a highly folivorous population of black and white colobus monkeys (Colobus guereza)Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2006
- Local Frequency Dependence and Global CoexistenceTheoretical Population Biology, 1999
- Fission and troop size in a mountain baboon populationAnimal Behaviour, 1997
- Sex-biased dispersal in African wild dogs,Lycaon pictusAnimal Behaviour, 1996
- A Stochastic Metapopulation Model with Variability in Patch Size and PositionTheoretical Population Biology, 1995
- Group fusions and minimum group sizes in vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops)American Journal of Primatology, 1991
- The influence of intergroup competition on the survival and reproduction of female vervet monkeysBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 1987