Effect of prazosin vs placebo on chronic left ventricular heart failure.

Authors:
  • WAW S Aronow
    W S Aronow
  • MLM Lurie
    M Lurie
  • MTM Turbow
    M Turbow
  • KWK Whittaker
    K Whittaker
  • SCS Van Camp
    S Van Camp
  • DHD Hughes
    D Hughes
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The effect of the vasodilator prazosin vs placebo on exercise duration until marked dyspnea, and on left ventricular function measured by echocardiography, was evaluated in a double-blind, randomized study in 24 patients with chronic left ventricular failure despite digitalis and diuretic therapy. Compared with the double-blind placebo, prazosin reduced resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure and systolic blood pressure times heart rate, improved clinical symptoms, decreased cardiothoracic ratio measured by chest roentgenography, decreased left ventricular and left atrial dimensions, improved ejection fraction and Vcf measured by echocardiography, and improved treadmill exercise duration. All 12 patients taking prazosin had greater than or equal to 20% improved treadmill exercise duration; none of 12 receiving placebo improved. In six of 12 patients taking prazosin, roentgenographic evidence of pulmonary venous congestion disappeared compared with none of the patients on placebo. These data suggest that prazosin may be effective in treating chronic left ventricular failure.

This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit: