Systemic Corruption and the Programme on Basic Education in the Philippine Department of Education
Author:
- 1 October 2009
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Developing Societies
- Vol. 25 (4) , 481-510
Abstract
This article contextualizes corruption and implementation as it occurs in the Philippine Department of Education (DepEd). Described as a national agency suffering from ’systemic corruption’, an in-depth qualitative case study analysis of one of its programmes is imperative. The Programme on Basic Education (PROBE) hailed as a success and which has managed to be relatively free from corrupt activities is the focus. Providing findings from a study undertaken on PROBE participants from the three main islands of the Philippines, this article analyzes the various organizational factors that have an impact on the prevalence and absence of corruption and the enabling and disabling elements of successful implementation.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Case study of implementation amidst corruption linkages: the National Textbook Delivery Program (TDP) of the Philippine Department of EducationJournal of Education Policy, 2009
- Corruption and Policy Implementation in the Philippines: A Comparative Analysis of the Teacher Training and Textbook Delivery ProgrammesAsian Journal of Political Science, 2007
- Development, Democracy and the NGO SectorJournal of Developing Societies, 2006
- Designing Anti-Corruption Strategies for Developing CountriesJournal of Developing Societies, 2006
- Misunderstanding African politics: corruption & the governance agendaReview of African Political Economy, 1998
- Cleaning up and invigorating the civil servicePublic Administration and Development, 1997
- The Politics of Privilege: Assessing the Impact of Rents, Corruption, and Clientelism on Third World DevelopmentPolitical Studies, 1997
- The Philippines1980
- The Policy Implementation ProcessAdministration & Society, 1975
- Corruption, Machine Politics, and Political ChangeAmerican Political Science Review, 1969