ChatGPT performance on multiple choice question examinations in higher education. A pragmatic scoping review
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 17 January 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Vol. 49 (6) , 781-798
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating the Performance of ChatGPT in Ophthalmology: An Analysis of its Successes and ShortcomingsmedRxiv, 2023
- How Does ChatGPT Perform on the Medical Licensing Exams? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge AssessmentmedRxiv, 2022
- OK google: what’s the answer? characteristics of students who searched the internet during an online chemistry examinationAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022
- The Case for Pragmatic Evidence-Based Higher Education: A Useful Way Forward?Frontiers in Education, 2020
- The impact of preprints in Library and Information Science: an analysis of citations, usage and social attention indicatorsScientometrics, 2020
- Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm and Its Implications for Social Work ResearchSocial Sciences, 2019
- PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and ExplanationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2018
- The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature SearchingPLOS ONE, 2015
- The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journalsJournal of Informetrics, 2013
- Using thematic analysis in psychologyQualitative Research in Psychology, 2006