The effect of addition of 2DCT scans and 3DCT scans for the classification of tibial plateau fractures: a systematic review
Open Access
- 28 September 2023
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
- Vol. 50 (1) , 71-79
Abstract
Purpose: In this systematic review, we evaluate the effect of radiographs and 2D and 3D imaging techniques on the interobserver agreement of six commonly used classification systems for tibial plateau fractures. Methods: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science were searched for studies regarding the effect of 2D and 3D imaging techniques on the interobserver agreement of tibial plateau classification systems. Studies validating new classification systems, not providing own data or only providing information on the interobserver agreement for radiographs were excluded. Studies were scored based on the ROBINS-I risk of bias tool. Results: Our review analysed 14 studies on different classification systems used for tibial plateau fractures in clinical practice, with the Schatzker classification being the most commonly used classification system. The results showed that the addition of 2D CT led to a significant improvement of interobserver agreement for one study. However, other included studies showed varying levels of interobserver agreement, ranging from fair to substantial according to the interpretation by Landis and Koch. The addition of 3D CT resulted in a significant deterioration in one study for the Schatzker classification. Similar to the addition of 2D CT, the interobserver agreement for the Schatzker classification with the addition of 3D CT were heterogeneous ranging from fair to almost perfect according to the interpretation by Landis and Koch. Conclusions: The use of 2D CT can be recommended for classifying tibial plateau fractures with the Schatzker classification, AO/OTA classification and Hohl classification. The value of 3D CT on the interobserver agreement of commonly used classification systems remains uncertain and unproven. Therefore, we do not recommend the use of 3D CT for the classification of tibial plateau fractures. Overall, the advancement of imaging techniques is not in line with the advancement in interobserver agreement on fracture classification.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Three-column classification and Schatzker classification: a three- and two-dimensional computed tomography characterisation and analysis of tibial plateau fracturesEuropean Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2013
- Two-dimensional and three-dimensional computed tomography for the classification and characterisation of tibial plateau fracturesInjury, 2011
- Classification and treatment of proximal humerus fractures: inter-observer reliability and agreement across imaging modalities and experienceJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2011
- The value of a CT scan compared to plain radiographs for the classification and treatment plan in tibial plateau fracturesEmergency Radiology, 2011
- Three-Column Fixation for Complex Tibial Plateau FracturesJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2010
- Evaluation of Computed Tomography for Determining the Diagnosis of Acetabular FracturesJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2010
- Classification systems for tibial plateau fractures; Does computed tomography scanning improve their reliability?Injury, 2010
- Three-dimensional computed tomography imaging increases the reliability of classification systems for tibial plateau fracturesInjury, 2009
- Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium - 2007Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2007
- An evaluation of homogeneity tests in meta-analyses in pain using simulations of individual patient dataPain, 2000