Comparison of Patient and Proxy EORTC QLQ-C30 Ratings in Assessing the Quality of Life of Cancer Patients
Authors:
- Kommer C.A. SneeuwKSKommer C.A. Sneeuw
- Neil K. AaronsonNANeil K. Aaronson
- Mirjam A.G. SprangersMSMirjam A.G. Sprangers
- Symone B. DetmarSDSymone B. Detmar
- Lidwina D.V. WeverLWLidwina D.V. Wever
- Jan H. SchornagelJSJan H. Schornagel
- 1 July 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 51 (7) , 617-631
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of Proxies to Measure Health and Functional Status in Epidemiologic Studies of Community-dwelling Women Aged 65 Years and OlderAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1996
- Determining functional/health status and its relation to disability in stroke survivors.Stroke, 1994
- Measuring quality of life in stroke.Stroke, 1993
- The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: A reviewJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- The Validity of Proxy-Generated Scores as Measures of Patient Health StatusMedical Care, 1991
- Methodologic issues in assessing the quality of life of cancer patientsCancer, 1991
- Reliability of proxy response on mental health indices for aged, community-dwelling women.Psychology and Aging, 1990
- Using Proxies to Evaluate Quality of LifeMedical Care, 1989
- Patient-proxy response comparability on measures of patient health and functional statusJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1988
- Use of a Surrogate for the Sickness Impact ProfileMedical Care, 1984