Piezosurgery Versus Conventional Method Alveoloplasty: A Comparative Study

Authors:
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Purpose The conventional alveoloplasty approach which uses manual equipment results in more resorption of the underlying alveolar ridge that makes denture prosthesis unstable. The goal of this study was to compare results of piezosurgery alveoloplasty to those of conventional alveoloplasty. Materials and Methods This was an in-vivo comparative study consisting of ten edentulous individuals who needed alveoloplasty due to bilateral bony projection. On one side, a conventional alveoloplasty was performed with a bone rongeur and bone file, whereas the contralateral side was treated with a piezosurgery unit. The clinical parameters were analyzed using SPSS version 21 software including operating time, postoperative pain evaluation on day 3 and a healing on day 7. Results There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of outcome variables such as operating time, pain and healing. The Conventional group has a lower mean of operating time, a higher mean rank of VAS and a lower mean rank of healing index compared to the piezosurgery group. Conclusion Piezosurgery alveoloplasty not only lowers postoperative patient discomfort but also preserves alveolar bone integrity by not disrupting soft and hard tissue architecture thus allowing faster tissue healing and easier prosthesis replacement in the future.

This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit: