Classifications In Brief: The Paprosky Classification of Femoral Bone Loss
- 1 March 2017
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Vol. 475 (3) , 917-921
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validity and Reliability of the Paprosky Acetabular Defect ClassificationClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2013
- Extensively Porous-coated Stems for Femoral Revision: Reliable Choice for Stem Revision in Paprosky Femoral Type III DefectsOrthopedics, 2012
- The Epidemiology of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United StatesJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2009
- Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Extensively Porous Coated Femoral StemClinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 2009
- Femoral impaction bone allografting with an Exeter cemented collarless, polished, tapered stem in revision hip replacementThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2008
- Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2007
- The reliability of validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacementThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2000
- BYPASS FIXATIONOrthopedic Clinics of North America, 1998
- Outcome of revision for mechanical stem failure using the cemented Charnley's stemThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1996
- Klassifikation und Behandlungsrichtlinien von Knochensubstanzverlusten bei Revisionsoperationen am Hüftgelenk — mittelfristige Ergebnisse1987