Pregnant individuals' genetic literacy and decisional conflict about prenatal screening tests: A cross‐sectional study
- 16 July 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Vol. 34 (2)
Abstract
Understanding the prenatal screening and diagnostic tests performed during pregnancy and making a decision in line with the test results can be a complex process for pregnant individuals and their families. Therefore, this study examined pregnant individuals' genetic literacy and decisional conflict regarding prenatal screening tests. The study was conducted with 328 pregnant individuals who applied to a training and research hospital to receive antenatal care between April 05 and September 30, 2021. Research data were collected by using the “Decisional Conflict Scale,” “SURE Scale,” and “Genetic Literacy and Comprehension Measure.” The mean age of the participants was 28.69 ± 5.48, and the mean gestational week was 25.90 ± 10.43. A statistically significant difference was found between the educational levels of the pregnant individuals and the genetic literacy and comprehension scales (p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was found between getting information about prenatal screening tests, having a screening test and decisional conflict scale, SURE Scale, and genetic literacy and comprehension scales (p < 0.001). A weak, negative, statistically significant correlation was found between the genetic literacy and comprehension familiarity and decision conflict scales (r = −0.177, p = 0.001). It is well known that pregnant individuals have difficulty understanding and interpreting test results due to prenatal screening tests that include genetic information. In our study, approximately half of the pregnant individuals received information about prenatal screening tests. Therefore, prenatal care must include the necessary information about prenatal screening tests. The study found that as the genetic literacy of pregnant individuals increased, the conflict of decisions they experienced decreased. Accordingly, it is suggested that interventions to increase genetic literacy among pregnant individuals may be effective in reducing decisional conflict regarding prenatal screening tests.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interventions aiming to improve informed decision on prenatal screening and testing: A scoping review of the literatureJournal of Genetic Counseling, 2021
- Pregnant Hispanic women's views and knowledge of prenatal genetic testingJournal of Genetic Counseling, 2021
- Understanding Taiwanese Women's Decisional Experiences Regarding Prenatal Screening Procedures And Diagnostics: A Phenomenological StudyAsian Nursing Research, 2020
- Current landscape of prenatal genetic screening and testingBirth Defects Research, 2019
- High risk—What's next? A survey study on decisional conflict, regret, and satisfaction among high‐risk pregnant women making choices about further prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidyPrenatal Diagnosis, 2019
- Genetic Literacy of pregnant women and their use of prenatal screening and diagnostic tests in TurkeyJournal of Genetic Counseling, 2019
- Decision outcomes in women offered noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) for positive Down screening resultsThe Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2017
- Group genetic counseling: An alternate service delivery model in a high risk prenatal screening populationPrenatal Diagnosis, 2017
- Relationships Between Health Literacy and Genomics-Related Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, Perceived Importance, and Communication in a Medically Underserved PopulationJournal of Health Communication, 2016
- Comparisons of various types of normality testsJournal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 2011