Verify to learn: Inspectable AI use in introductory mechanics for engineering students
- 13 November 2026
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education
Abstract
This study reports a short classroom intervention designed to make students’ use of artificial intelligence (AI) visible while promoting critical verification in introductory mechanics. The activity was implemented in a first-year, calculus-based physics course for engineering students with two parallel sections ( n = 42 and n = 33 ). Using a crossover structure across the work–energy and impulse–momentum units, students completed the activity under AI-supported and non-AI classroom configurations. An additional AI-supported implementation was carried out in rotational dynamics. Each one-hour session included conceptual pre-task and post-task items, an isomorphic problem-solving activity, and a structured verification section. For the conceptual component, no immediate changes were detected in the work–energy and impulse–momentum units. For the problem-solving component, the analysis compared students’ initial attempt with the final revised solution submitted after verification. This final solution is interpreted as the quality of the product produced within the activity, rather than as an independent post-test of problem-solving ability. In both crossover units, final revised solution accuracy was higher in the AI-supported configuration than in the non-AI configuration, with the largest initial-to-final changes appearing in more demanding multi-step items. Written critical comments were common in AI-supported sessions, although they are interpreted as evidence of documented engagement with verification rather than as a direct measure of evaluative judgment. The intervention offers a practical way to incorporate AI into ordinary assessment while shifting attention from answer retrieval to reasoning, checking, and evaluation.This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- The cognitive impact of ChatGPT in higher education: A systematic review of critical and creative thinking outcomesComputers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2026
- Student engagement with ChatGPT for educational tasks: Effects of inoculation training on verification intentions and behaviorComputers and Education Open, 2026
- Less stress, better scores, same learning: The dissociation of performance and learning in AI-supported programming educationComputers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2025
- How are faculty and college students embracing AI? — A multi-informant mixed method studyComputers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2025
- AI tutoring outperforms in-class active learning: an RCT introducing a novel research-based design in an authentic educational settingScientific Reports, 2025
- A qualitative systematic review on AI empowered self-regulated learning in higher educationnpj Science of Learning, 2025
- Measuring undergraduate students' reliance on Generative AI during problem-solving: Scale development and validationComputers & Education, 2025
- Developing evaluative judgement for a time of generative artificial intelligenceAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
- Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policyInternational Journal of Information Management, 2023
- ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for educationLearning and Individual Differences, 2023