Prone vs Supine Positioning for Breast Cancer Radiotherapy
Authors:
- Silvia C. FormentiSFSilvia C. Formenti
- J. Keith DeWyngaertJDJ. Keith DeWyngaert
- Gabor JozsefGJGabor Jozsef
- Judith D. GoldbergJGJudith D. Goldberg
Open Access
- 5 September 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 308 (9) , 861-863
Abstract
To the Editor: Adjuvant radiotherapy to the breast contributes to improved outcomes in breast cancer patients after breast preservation surgery.1 However, whole breast radiotherapy is associated with damage to the heart and lung, increased cardiovascular mortality, and lung cancer development, with risks that remain 15 to 20 years after treatment.2 These consequences occur when breast cancer patients are treated supine. Preliminary data on prone positioning suggest that radiation exposure to the heart and lung can be reduced compared with supine positioning3,4 with similar efficacy.5 To test the hypothesis that prone positioning is superior to standard supine positioning, we compared the volume of heart and lung within the radiation field in a prospective study of patients who underwent simulation in both positions.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10 801 women in 17 randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2011
- Phase I-II Trial of Prone Accelerated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy to the Breast to Optimally Spare Normal TissueJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Whole-Breast Irradiation Delivered in the Prone PositionInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP), 2007
- Long-term mortality from heart disease and lung cancer after radiotherapy for early breast cancer: prospective cohort study of about 300 000 women in US SEER cancer registriesThe Lancet Oncology, 2005