Comparative Effectiveness of an mTOR-Based Systemic Therapy Regimen in Advanced, Metaplastic and Nonmetaplastic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Authors:
Open Access
- 23 August 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Oncologist
- Vol. 23 (11) , 1300-1309
Abstract
Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease with subtypes having different “targetable” molecular aberrations. Metaplastic breast cancers (MpBCs) are typically TNBCs and commonly have alterations in the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. We previously reported efficacy for an mTOR-based chemotherapy regimen in MpBC. To determine if tumor subtype influences prognosis, we compared treatment outcomes of patients with MpBC with those of patients with nonmetaplastic TNBC receiving an mTOR-based systemic therapy regimen. Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced MpBC and nonmetaplastic TNBC were treated at our institution from April 16, 2009, through November 4, 2014, using mTOR inhibition (temsirolimus or everolimus) with liposomal doxorubicin and bevacizumab (DAT/DAE). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between tumor histology and outcomes. Multivariable models were adjusted for all covariates. Results: Fourteen patients with nonmetaplastic TNBC and 59 patients with advanced MpBC were treated with DAT/DAE. MpBC patients were older (p = .002) and less likely to have a history of bevacizumab use (p = .023). Median PFS for the nonmetaplastic TNBC and MpBC patients was 2.5 months and 4.8 months, respectively. This difference in PFS was statistically significant on univariable (p = .006) but not multivariable analysis (p = .087). Median OS for the nonmetaplastic TNBC and MpBC patients was 3.7 months and 10.0 months, respectively (p = .0003). MpBC remained significantly associated with improved OS on multivariable analysis (p < .0001). Conclusion: In our study, DAT/DAE appeared to be more effective in MpBC compared with nonmetaplastic TNBC. These data support patient selection for targeted therapy in TNBC. Implications for Practice: Metaplastic breast cancers (MpBCs) represent <1% of all breast cancers, demonstrate mesenchymal differentiation, and are typically resistant to chemotherapy. Patients with advanced MpBC treated with an mTOR-based systemic therapy regimen had better long-term outcomes compared with patients with nonmetaplastic triple-negative breast cancer treated with the same regimen, suggesting that metaplastic histology may predict benefit from agents targeting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- A systematic review of bevacizumab efficacy in breast cancerCancer Treatment Reviews, 2014
- A Phase I Trial of Liposomal Doxorubicin, Bevacizumab, and Temsirolimus in Patients with Advanced Gynecologic and Breast MalignanciesClinical Cancer Research, 2011
- Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapiesJournal of Clinical Investigation, 2011
- Worse prognosis of metaplastic breast cancer patients than other patients with triple-negative breast cancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2010
- Pathobiology, prognosis, and targeted therapy for renal cell carcinoma: exploiting the hypoxia-induced pathway.2003
- Predictive factors of response to first-line chemotherapy in 1426 women with metastatic breast cancerEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2000
- Predictive Factors for Response to Cytotoxic Treatment in Advanced Breast Cancer a ReviewActa Oncologica, 1996
- Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast: V. Metaplastic carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cellsHuman Pathology, 1990
- Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. IV. Squamous cell carcinoma of ductal originCancer, 1990
- Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. II. Spindle cell carcinomaHuman Pathology, 1989