Differences in Quality of Life Related to Lower Urinary Tract, Bowel and Sexual Function After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with and Without Nerve-Sparing
Open Access
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The objective of this study is to compare nerve-sparing (NS) and non-nerve-sparing (NNS) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) techniques used to treat localized prostate cancer. Numerous studies have evaluated the impact of NS techniques on patient-reported outcomes. However, there are unaddressed methodological issues making interpretation of results difficult. Therefore, we performed a comparison of the two techniques, accounting for methodological threats, including patient selection and confounding. Methods: We sampled 120 patients with similar disease burden who underwent RARP by the same surgeon, either with NS (n = 84) or NNS (n = 36) and assessed changes in lower urinary tract (LUT) function and bother, and bowel function/bother using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire and the six-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-6) survey at 6 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. Multivariable linear regression models were used to adjust for differences in age, preoperative PSA levels, pathological tumor stage and Gleason-score of patients receiving either NS or NNS. Results: At 6 weeks postoperatively, the NNS group had a significantly larger decrease in LUT function compared to the NS group (−17.42; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): −31.31, −3.53; p = 0.0145). At 12 months, both groups recovered substantially, and no group differences were observed (p > 0.9). No significant differences were observed between the NS and NNS groups for the EPIC bowel subscores, whereas the IIEF-6 showed borderline significance at 12 months. Conclusions: The results suggest a small impact of NS vs. NNS RARP on important patient-reported outcomes when controlling for tumor biology, surgeon skill, and patient characteristics. These results need to be confirmed by larger studies using similar sampling strategies and design considerations.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of nerve-sparing procedures on bowel function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A longitudinal studyThe International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2020
- Age-specific health-related quality of life in disease-free long-term prostate cancer survivors versus male population controls—results from a population-based studySupportive Care in Cancer, 2019
- The Effect of Nerve Sparing Status on Sexual and Urinary Function: 3-Year Results from the CEASAR StudyJournal of Urology, 2018
- Long‐term quality of life after definitive treatment for prostate cancer: patient‐reported outcomes in the second posttreatment decadeCancer Medicine, 2017
- Survival of male genital cancers (prostate, testis and penis) in Europe 1999–2007: Results from the EUROCARE-5 studyEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2015
- Preservation of the Neurovascular Bundles Is Associated with Improved Time to Continence After Radical Prostatectomy But Not Long-term Continence Rates: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-analysisEuropean Urology, 2015
- Minimal Clinically Important Differences in the Erectile Function Domain of the International Index of Erectile Function ScaleEuropean Urology, 2011
- Preoperative Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercise for Early Continence After Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomised Controlled StudyEuropean Urology, 2010
- An Assessment of Quality of Life Following Radical Prostatectomy, High Dose External Beam Radiation Therapy and Brachytherapy Iodine Implantation as Monotherapies for Localized Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 2007
- Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: Anatomical and pathological considerationsThe Prostate, 1983