The reduced N1 to self‐generated tones: An effect of temporal predictability?
Author:
- 24 January 2011
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Psychophysiology
- Vol. 48 (8) , 1088-1095
Abstract
Tones that are self‐generated elicit a smaller N1 than externally triggered tones. Typically, however, self‐generated tones are also more predictable in time than externally triggered ones. The present study investigated whether the attenuated N1 can be explained by predictability based on the temporal relationship between action and effect. Participants listened to tones that were self‐generated by a key‐press or preceded by a visual cue. The tones followed the key‐presses or cues after a fixed (predictable context) or variable delay (unpredictable context). Tones triggered by a key‐press elicited a smaller N1 than tones following a visual cue. This finding suggests that the reduced N1 to self‐generated tones is not merely due to the fact that the tone's timing can be predicted based on its temporal relationship to the key‐press. Whether a tone was presented in a predictable or an unpredictable context did not affect the N1.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mere Expectation to Move Causes Attenuation of Sensory SignalsPLOS ONE, 2008
- Sensorimotor attenuation by central motor command signals in the absence of movementNature Neuroscience, 2005
- Supplementary motor area provides an efferent signal for sensory suppressionCognitive Brain Research, 2004
- Why canʼt you tickle yourself?NeuroReport, 2000
- Forward Models for Physiological Motor ControlNeural Networks, 1996
- The N1 Wave of the Human Electric and Magnetic Response to Sound: A Review and an Analysis of the Component StructurePsychophysiology, 1987
- The ɛ‐Adjustment Procedure for Repeated‐Measures Analyses of VariancePsychophysiology, 1976
- Neural Attenuation of Responses to Emitted Sounds in Echolocating BatsScience, 1972
- Das ReafferenzprinzipThe Science of Nature, 1950
- Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1950