A COMPARISON OF TWO ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT SCALES1
Authors:
- 1 March 1983
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Personnel Psychology
- Vol. 36 (1) , 87-98
Abstract
This study examines the scale characteristics of two widely utilized measures of organizational commitment. Using data collected from a sample of 1,105 professional accountants, the findings indicated that while both instruments exhibited a high degree of internal reliability, the Porter et al. (1974) instrument exhibited significantly greater predictive validity with respect to intended turnover than did the Hrebiniak and Alutto (1972) instrument. However, for a limited sample of data, no difference was found between the predictive ability of the two measures with respect to actual turnover. In addition, the relationship between a set of ten common predictor variables and organizational commitment was found to be substantially greater when commitment was measured using the Porter et al. instrument.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- An examination of professional commitment in public accountingAccounting, Organizations and Society, 1981
- Operationalizing the Moskos institution-occupation model: An application of Gouldner's cosmopolitan-local research.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978
- Unit performance, situational factors, and employee attitudes in spatially separated work unitsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1974
- Investments and Involvements as Mechanisms Producing Commitment to the OrganizationAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1971
- Personal Factors in Organizational IdentificationAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1970
- An Empirical Study of Howard Becker's Side-Bet TheorySocial Forces, 1969
- Commitment and Social Organization: A Study of Commitment Mechanisms in Utopian CommunitiesAmerican Sociological Review, 1968
- Notes on the Concept of CommitmentAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1960
- The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary StatementAmerican Sociological Review, 1960
- Social Behavior as ExchangeAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1958