Highly Reproducible, Vendor‐Agnostic, Motion‐Insensitive Liver PDFF Mapping at 0.55T , 1.5T , and 3T
Authors:
- Jiayi TangJTJiayi Tang
- Daiki TamadaDaiki Tamada
- Jon‐Fredrik NielsenJon‐Fredrik Nielsen
- Jitka StarekovaJitka Starekova
- Julius F. HeidenreichJulius F. Heidenreich
- Felix SchönFelix Schön
- Alexandra A. AnagnostopoulosAAAlexandra A. Anagnostopoulos
- Amirhossein RoshanshadAmirhossein Roshanshad
- Lu MaoLu Mao
- Shohei FujitaShohei Fujita
- Pengcheng XuPXPengcheng Xu
- Christopher KeenCKChristopher Keen
Open Access
- 12 December 2025
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Vol. 95 (5) , 2797-2813
Abstract
Purpose: To develop and validate a vendor‐agnostic, motion‐insensitive proton‐density fat‐fraction (PDFF) quantification method. Methods: Flip‐angle‐modulated (FAM) 2D chemical‐shift‐encoded (CSE) MRI for PDFF quantification was implemented in both the vendor‐agnostic platform Pulseq (“Pulseq‐FAM”) and one vendor‐specific platform (“GE‐specific FAM”). These implementations were distributed to four sites with twelve MR systems of three vendors (Siemens/GE/Philips) and field strengths (0.55T/1.5T/3T). A sequentially‐shipped 16‐vial phantom (PDFF = 0%–30%/T1 water = 200–1400 ms) underwent confounder‐corrected PDFF mapping with commercial 3D‐CSE methods and GE‐specific FAM as available on each system, and Pulseq‐FAM on every system. To assess bias, phantom PDFF measurements were compared to reference. Between‐system variance was evaluated with linear mixed‐effects modeling. Different volunteers were also imaged at each site to assess free‐breathing PDFF mapping feasibility. A prospective single‐site volunteer study was also conducted. Adult patients and children were imaged with breath‐held 3D‐CSE and free‐breathing GE‐specific and Pulseq‐FAM. Radiologists evaluated images for overall quality and motion artifacts. To assess bias, Pulseq‐FAM PDFF measurements were compared to 3D‐CSE and GE‐specific FAM. Test–retest repeatability was assessed by re‐imaging after repositioning. Between‐field‐strength reproducibility was assessed at 1.5T and 3.0T. Results: In the multi‐center study, Pulseq‐FAM showed reduced T1‐bias and between‐system variability versus 3D‐CSE in phantom PDFF measurements, and free‐breathing feasibility in volunteers. In the single‐site volunteer study ( N = 57), Pulseq‐FAM improved image quality and motion artifacts versus 3D‐CSE ( p < 0.01). Pulseq‐FAM showed excellent agreement with 3D‐CSE (95% limits‐of‐agreement (LoA) = 3.4% PDFF) and GE‐specific FAM (LoA = 2.0%). Pulseq‐FAM showed excellent repeatability (repeatability coefficient (RC) = 1.6% PDFF) and between‐field‐strength reproducibility (reproducibility coefficient (RDC) = 2.4%) versus 3D‐CSE (RC = 2.7%/RDC = 3.4%; differences p < 0.05). Conclusion: Pulseq‐FAM enables accurate, reproducible, vendor‐agnostic, and motion‐insensitive PDFF quantification in adults and children.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB031886)
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB032378)
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R44EB025729)
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- Motion‐Insensitive Flip Angle Modulated Liver Proton Density Fat‐Fraction and R2* Mapping During Free‐Breathing MRI in a Clinical SettingJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2025
- FISPGHAN statement on the global public health impact of metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver diseaseJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 2024
- Limits of Fat Quantification in the Presence of Iron OverloadJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2021
- Noninvasive, Quantitative Assessment of Liver Fat by MRI‐PDFF as an Endpoint in NASH TrialsHepatology, 2018
- Motion artifacts in MRI: A complex problem with many partial solutionsJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2015
- T1 bias in chemical shift‐encoded liver fat‐fraction: Role of the flip angleJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2013
- Utility of magnetic resonance imaging versus histology for quantifying changes in liver fat in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease trialsHepatology, 2013
- Fat quantification with IDEAL gradient echo imaging: Correction of bias from T1 and noiseMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2007
- Controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration (CAIPIRINHA) for multi‐slice imagingMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2005
- The NMR phased arrayMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1990