Risks of use and non-use of antibiotics in primary care: qualitative study of prescribers’ views
Open Access
Abstract
Purpose: The emergence of antimicrobial resistance has led to increasing efforts to reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics in primary care, but potential hazards from bacterial infection continue to cause concern. This study investigated how primary care prescribers perceive risk and safety concerns associated with reduced antibiotic prescribing. Methods: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews conducted with primary care prescribers from 10 general practices in an urban area and a shire town in England. A thematic analysis was conducted. Results: Thirty participants were recruited, including twenty-three general practitioners, five nurses and two pharmacists. Three main themes were identified: risk assessment, balancing treatment risks and negotiating decisions and risks. Respondents indicated that their decisions were grounded in clinical risk assessment, but this was informed by different approaches to antibiotic use, with most leaning towards reduced prescribing. Prescribers’ perceptions of risk included the consequences of both inappropriate prescribing and inappropriate withholding of antibiotics. Sepsis was viewed as the most concerning potential outcome of non-prescribing, leading to possible patient harm and potential litigation. Risks of antibiotic prescribing included antibiotic resistant and Clostridium difficile infections, as well as side effects, such as rashes, that might lead to possible mislabelling as antibiotic allergy. Prescribers elicited patient preferences for use or avoidance of antibiotics to inform management strategies, which included educational advice, advice on self-management including warning signs, use of delayed prescriptions and safety netting. Conclusions: Attitudes towards antibiotic prescribing are evolving, with reduced antibiotic prescribing now being approached more systematically. The safety trade-offs associated with either use or non-use of antibiotics present difficulties especially when prescribing decisions are inconsistent with patients’ expectations.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- Health and Social Care Delivery Research Programme (16/116/46)
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are Patient Views about Antibiotics Related to Clinician Perceptions, Management and Outcome? A Multi-Country Study in Outpatients with Acute CoughPLOS ONE, 2013
- Understanding physician antibiotic prescribing behaviour: a systematic review of qualitative studiesInternational Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2013
- Training family physicians in shared decision-making to reduce the overuse of antibiotics in acute respiratory infections: a cluster randomized trialCanadian Medical Association Journal, 2012
- Attitudes of primary care physicians to the prescribing of antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance: a qualitative study from SpainFamily Practice, 2011
- Antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care: a systematic review and meta-ethnographyJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2011
- Making decisions about prescription drugs: A study of doctor–patient communicationHealth, Risk & Society, 2011
- Effect of antibiotic prescribing in primary care on antimicrobial resistance in individual patients: systematic review and meta-analysisBMJ, 2010
- Protective effect of antibiotics against serious complications of common respiratory tract infections: retrospective cohort study with the UK General Practice Research DatabaseBMJ, 2007
- Using thematic analysis in psychologyQualitative Research in Psychology, 2006
- Acute cough: a qualitative analysis of how GPs manage the consultation when patients explicitly or implicitly expect antibiotic prescriptionsFamily Practice, 2004