Effect of Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy on Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Revascularization: A Prespecified Analysis of the MINT Trial
Authors:
- Sunil V. RaoSRSunil V. Rao
- Maria Mori BrooksMBMaria Mori Brooks
- P. Gabriel StegPSP. Gabriel Steg
- Tabassome SimonTSTabassome Simon
- Herbert D. AronowHAHerbert D. Aronow
- Andrew M. GoldsweigAGAndrew M. Goldsweig
- Shahbaz MalikSMShahbaz Malik
- Caroline AlsweilerCACaroline Alsweiler
- Kalon K.L. HoKHKalon K.L. Ho
- Payam DehghaniPDPayam Dehghani
- Adriano CaixetaACAdriano Caixeta
- 1 May 2025
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 18 (5) , e015249
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The MINT trial (Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion; N=3504) randomized patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and hemoglobin ≤10 g/dL to liberal (maintain hemoglobin ≥10 g/dL) or restrictive (maintain hemoglobin ≥8 g/dL) red blood cell transfusion. The results suggested a benefit on 30-day death or MI with a liberal transfusion strategy. The effect of transfusion in patients with acute MI undergoing revascularization is unclear. METHODS: In this prespecified analysis of the MINT trial, patients who underwent revascularization (n=1002) before randomization but during index hospitalization were compared with those who did not (n=2442). The primary outcome was 30-day death or MI; secondary outcomes included 30-day death, recurrent MI, the composite of death, recurrent MI, ischemia-driven unscheduled revascularization, or readmission for ischemic cardiac diagnosis, heart failure, and cardiac death. Multivariable log-binomial regression was used to determine the relative risks of the primary and secondary outcomes by transfusion strategy for revascularized and nonrevascularized patients with interaction terms. RESULTS: Patients undergoing revascularization were younger, more often female, and had fewer comorbidities than those who did not. There was no significant interaction between revascularization and assigned transfusion strategy for any outcome except cardiac death. Compared with liberal transfusion, restrictive transfusion increased the risk of 30-day cardiac death among nonrevascularized patients (relative risk, 2.45 [1.58–3.81]) but not among revascularized patients (relative risk, 0.97 [0.59,–1.60]; interaction P =0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of the MINT trial, revascularization did not alter the effect of the randomized transfusion strategy on 30-day death or MI. The hypothesis-generating finding that a restrictive transfusion strategy was associated with an increased risk of cardiac death among patients with anemia and acute MI who do not undergo revascularization requires confirmation. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02981407.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL 133817-01)
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Restrictive Versus Liberal Transfusion in Patients With Type 1 or Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: A Prespecified Analysis of the MINT TrialCirculation, 2024
- Restrictive or Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Myocardial Infarction and AnemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2023
- Comparison of Investigator-Reported vs Centrally Adjudicated Major Adverse Cardiac EventsJAMA Network Open, 2022
- Rationale and design for the myocardial ischemia and transfusion (MINT) randomized clinical trialAmerican Heart Journal, 2022
- Frequency, Regional Variation, and Predictors of Undetermined Cause of Death in Cardiometabolic Clinical Trials: A Pooled Analysis of 9259 Deaths in 9 TrialsCirculation, 2019
- Exploring the Treatment-Risk Paradox in Coronary DiseaseArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2007
- Bleeding and blood transfusion issues in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromesEuropean Heart Journal, 2007
- Association of Hemoglobin Levels With Clinical Outcomes in Acute Coronary SyndromesCirculation, 2005
- Relationship of Blood Transfusion and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary SyndromesJAMA, 2004