Task Switching in a Hierarchical Task Structure: Evidence for the Fragility of the Task Repetition Benefit.
Authors:
- Mei-Ching LienMLMei-Ching Lien
- Eric RuthruffEREric Ruthruff
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Vol. 30 (3) , 697-713
Abstract
This study examined how task switching is affected by hierarchical task organization. Traditional task-switching studies, which use a constant temporal and spatial distance between each task element (defined as a stimulus requiring a response), promote a flat task structure. Using this approach, Experiment 1 revealed a large switch cost of 238 ms. In Experiments 2-5, adjacent task elements were grouped temporally and/or spatially (forming an ensemble) to create a hierarchical task organization. Results indicate that the effect of switching at the ensemble level dominated the effect of switching at the element level. Experiments 6 and 7, using an ensemble of 3 task elements, revealed that the element-level switch cost was virtually absent between ensembles but was large within an ensemble. The authors conclude that the element-level task repetition benefit is fragile and can be eliminated in a hierarchical task organization.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Task-set reconfiguration with binary and three-valued task dimensionsPsychological Research, 2001
- Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations.Psychological Review, 2001
- Switching between simple cognitive tasks: The interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2001
- Patterns, chunks, and hierarchies in serial reaction-time tasksPsychological Research, 2000
- Hierarchical switching in a multi-dimensional task spacePsychological Research, 1999
- On the origin of mixing costs: Exploring information processing in pure and mixed blocks of trialsActa Psychologica, 1996
- Learning and the coordination of sequential information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1995
- An Ordinal Coefficient of Relational Agreement for Multiple JudgesPsychometrika, 1994
- Attention to Action1986
- Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review, 1977