Who speaks? Individual and institutional predictors of CEO activism
Authors:
- 16 April 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Social Science Quarterly
- Vol. 104 (4) , 521-534
Abstract
Background: CEOs increasingly take public stands on social and political issues tangential to their corporation.s core mission. Emergent research on this phenomenon has explored the prevalence, impacts and risks of increasing CEO activism for firms. However, very little research has explored the individual and institutional factors that motivate CEO activism. This project attempts to refocus this nascent field by exploring the gendered, racial, sexual and organizational factors that motivate leaders to speak out on issues ranging from DEI, gun control, climate change, Black Lives Matter and #MeToo.Method: To answer our research question ‐ who speaks? ‐ we examined CEOs, companies, and key social issues within the Proquest Newsstand Database. First, we conducted a large exploratory study of random men and women CEOs to determine if gender differences exist. Next, we examined all women CEOs in the Fortune 500 and S&P 500 between 2019–2021 to provide a more thorough and nuanced analysis.Results: We find that women CEOs are more likely to speak out compared to men CEOs. Further, we find that BIPOC and LGBTQ+ CEOs are more likely to engage in activism compared to other CEOs. We also find that the market value of the firm and the presence of women on the board of directors serve as significant predictors of CEO activism compared to other firms.Conclusion: We consider the implications of these findings for the appointment, tenure and visibility of historically underrepresented CEOs.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Above the glass ceiling: When are women and racial/ethnic minorities promoted to CEO?Strategic Management Journal, 2013
- Corporate Political Activity: A Literature Review and Research AgendaInternational Journal of Management Reviews, 2012
- Female tokens in high-prestige work groups: Catalysts or inhibitors of group diversification?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2011
- Inequality RegimesGender & Society, 2006
- The Glass Cliff: Evidence that Women are Over‐Represented in Precarious Leadership PositionsBritish Journal of Management, 2005
- Same Behavior, Different Consequences: Reactions to Men's and Women's Altruistic Citizenship Behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005
- Corporate Political Activity: A Review and Research AgendaJournal of Management, 2004
- Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.Psychological Review, 2002
- Theories of Gender in Organizations: A New Approach to Organizational Analysis and Change11We are grateful to Lotte Bailyn and our colleagues affiliated with the Center for Gender in Organizations, Simmons Graduate School of Management – Gill Coleman, Joyce Fletcher, Deborah Kolb, Deborah Merrill-Sands, Rhona Rapoport, and Bridgette Sheridan – for their contributions to these ideas and for their foundational research, on which this paper builds. We also appreciate the feedback we received on an earlier draft from members of the FSC Research Group, Elaine Backman, Herminia Ibarra, Maureen Scully, and Kathleen Valley. We thank Joanne Martin and Barbara Reskin for their comments, which helped in our conceptual framing of the paper. Finally, we thank Bob Sutton and Barry Staw for their helpful suggestions. This research was funded in part by the Ford Foundation.Research in Organizational Behavior, 2000
- Follow the Leader: Mimetic Isomorphism and Entry Into New MarketsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1993