Anatomy-based fitting improves speech perception in noise for cochlear implant recipients with single-sided deafness
Authors:
Open Access
- 19 September 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
- Vol. 282 (1) , 467-479
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate objective and subjective hearing outcomes in experienced cochlear implant users with single sided deafness (SSD CI) who used fitting maps created via anatomy-based fitting (ABF) and clinically-based fitting (CBF). Participants: Twelve SSD CI users with postlingual hearing loss. Intervention: OTOPLAN (Version 3. (MED-EL) was used to determine intracochlear electrode contact positions using post-operative high-resolution flat panel volume computed tomography. From these positions, the corresponding center frequencies and bandwidths were derived for each channel. These were implemented in the clinical fitting software MAESTRO to yield an ABF map individualized to each user. Main Outcome Measures: ABF and CBF maps were compared. Objective speech perception in quiet and in noise, binaural effects, and self-perceived sound quality were evaluated. Results: Significantly higher speech perception in noise scores were observed with the ABF map compared to the CBF map (mean SRT50: -6.49 vs. -4.8 dB SNR for the S0NCI configuration and − 3.85 vs. -2.75 dB SNR for the S0N0 configuration). Summation and squelch effects were significantly increased with the ABF map (0.86 vs. 0.21 dB SNR for summation and 0.85 vs. -0.09 dB SNR for squelch). No improvement in speech perception in quiet or spatial release from masking were observed with the ABF map. A similar level of self-perceived sound quality was reported for each map. Upon the end of the study, all users opted to keep the ABF map. This preference was independent of the angular insertion depth of the electrode array. Conclusions: Experienced SSD CI users preferred using the ABF map, which gave them significant improvements in binaural hearing and some aspects of speech perception.Keywords
Funding Information
- Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Speech Recognition With an Organ of Corti Versus Spiral Ganglion Frequency-to-Place Function in Place-Based Mapping of Cochlear Implant and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation DevicesOtology & Neurotology, 2021
- Precise Evaluation of the Cochlear Duct Length by Flat-panel Volume Computed Tomography (fpVCT)—Implication of Secondary ReconstructionsOtology & Neurotology, 2020
- Evaluating the Decision for Cochlear Implantation in Individuals With Single-Sided Deafness (SSD); Implementing the SSD Consensus Protocol Into Clinical RoutineOtology & Neurotology, 2020
- Evaluating the Long-Term Hearing Outcomes of Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided DeafnessOtology & Neurotology, 2019
- The Relationship Between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear ImplantsEar & Hearing, 2015
- Cochlear Implantation Improves Localization Ability in Patients With Unilateral DeafnessEar & Hearing, 2015
- The Impact of Cochlear Implantation on Speech Understanding, Subjective Hearing Performance, and Tinnitus Perception in Patients with Unilateral Severe to Profound Hearing LossOtology & Neurotology, 2015
- Investigation of a matrix sentence test in noise: Reproducibility and discrimination function in cochlear implant patientsInternational Journal of Audiology, 2014
- Development and validation of a questionnaire for hearing implant users to self-assess their auditory abilities in everyday communication situations: the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI19)Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 2014
- A cochlear frequency-position function for several species—29 years laterThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1990