Automated Calculation of the Disruption Index: A Reproducible Computational Workflow for Large-Scale Bibliometric Analyses
Authors:
- Analina Braga ApolinárioAAAnalina Braga Apolinário
- Kaio Vinicius VieiraKVKaio Vinicius Vieira
- Ana Karolina Mendes Mathias CostaACAna Karolina Mendes Mathias Costa
- Larissa Costa FreitasLFLarissa Costa Freitas
- Isabela Sales PinheiroIPIsabela Sales Pinheiro
- Robert Willer Farinazzo VitralRVRobert Willer Farinazzo Vitral
- Marcio José da Silva CamposMCMarcio José da Silva Campos
Preprint
Abstract
Bibliometric analyses have become essential for understanding scientific production and innovation dynamics; however, large-scale applications remain limited by challenges related to data extraction, preprocessing, citation network reconstruction, and reproducibility, particularly when using PubMed-indexed records. This study presents a fully automated and reproducible computational workflow for large-scale bibliometric analyses based on the Disruption Index (DI). The pipeline enables systematic retrieval of PubMed data, standardized metadata processing, construction of citation networks, and calculation of DI values within a fixed post-publication citation window. Implemented in Python, the workflow integrates automated querying, XML parsing, data consolidation, and network-based citation classification, allowing scalable and transparent analyses that are infeasible through manual approaches. In a demonstrative application focused on orthodontic literature, the pipeline processed more than 67,000 articles and reconstructed over 300,000 citation relationships, resulting in a final analytical sample of 3,234 articles with indexed references and citations. The automated framework ensures methodological transparency, facilitates replication, and substantially reduces the time and technical barriers associated with advanced bibliometric studies. By providing an open and extensible solution for calculating the Disruption Index at scale, this workflow supports robust assessments of scientific innovation and consolidation and can be readily adapted to other biomedical research domains indexed in PubMed.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- What do we know about the disruption index in scientometrics? An overview of the literatureScientometrics, 2023
- Data, measurement and empirical methods in the science of scienceNature Human Behaviour, 2023
- SciSciNet: A large-scale open data lake for the science of science researchScientific Data, 2023
- Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over timeNature, 2023
- Rethinking the disruption index as a measure of scientific and technological advancesTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021
- Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peersQuantitative Science Studies, 2020
- The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in ScienceProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2020
- Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technologyNature, 2019
- Science of scienceScience, 2018
- Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknessesThe FASEB Journal, 2007