Facts and Constructs: Defining Reality in Higher Education Organizations
Author:
- William G. TierneyWTWilliam G. Tierney
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Project MUSE in The Review of Higher Education
- Vol. 11 (1) , 61-73
Abstract
This paper considers the implications for researchers and administrators if the organizational environment is interpreted as “enacted.” In so doing, the paper demonstrates now supposing that environments are socially constructed implies (different orientations to problem-solving and raises new research questions than if we assume environments are a finite number of objective facts. The essay differentiates between objective and enacted environments and suggests ways administrators might identify what they need to do and how they do it, given the socially constructed organization in which they find themselves.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Organizational Culture in Higher Education: Defining the EssentialsThe Journal of Higher Education, 1988
- Organizations as Constructions and Destructions of MeaningJournal of Management, 1985
- Organizational Culture in the Study of Higher EducationThe Review of Higher Education, 1985
- Administrative Effectiveness in Higher EducationThe Review of Higher Education, 1985
- Leadership: The Management of MeaningThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1982
- The management of academic culture: Notes on the management of meaning and social integrationHigher Education, 1982
- Paradigms, Metaphors, and Puzzle Solving in Organization TheoryAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1980
- Leadership: Where Else Can We Go?ILR Review, 1979
- The Dynamics of Organizational CommunicationAcademy of Management Review, 1978
- The Social Construction of RealityThe Modern Language Journal, 1967