Generative AI/LLMs for Plain Language Medical Information for Patients, Caregivers and General Public: Opportunities, Risks and Ethics
Authors:
- Avishek PalAPAvishek Pal
- Tenzin WangmoTWTenzin Wangmo
- Trishna BharadiaTBTrishna Bharadia
- Mithi Ahmed-RichardsMAMithi Ahmed-Richards
- Mayank Bhailalbhai BhanderiMBMayank Bhailalbhai Bhanderi
- Rohitbhai KachhadiyaRKRohitbhai Kachhadiya
- Samuel S AllemannSASamuel S Allemann
- Bernice Simone ElgerBEBernice Simone Elger
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 July 2025
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Patient Preference and Adherence
- Vol. ume 19, 2227-2249
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (gAI) tools and large language models (LLMs) are gaining popularity among non-specialist audiences (patients, caregivers, and the general public) as a source of plain language medical information. AI-based models have the potential to act as a convenient, customizable and easy-to-access source of information that can improve patients’ self-care and health literacy and enable greater engagement with clinicians. However, serious negative outcomes could occur if these tools fail to provide reliable, relevant and understandable medical information. Herein, we review published findings on opportunities and risks associated with such use of gAI/LLMs. We reviewed 44 articles published between January 2023 and July 2024. From the included articles, we find a focus on readability and accuracy; however, only three studies involved actual patients. Responses were reported to be reasonably accurate and sufficiently readable and detailed. The most commonly reported risks were oversimplification, over-generalization, lower accuracy in response to complex questions, and lack of transparency regarding information sources. There are ethical concerns that overreliance/unsupervised reliance on gAI/LLMs could lead to the “humanizing” of these models and pose a risk to patient health equity, inclusiveness and data privacy. For these technologies to be truly transformative, they must become more transparent, have appropriate governance and monitoring, and incorporate feedback from healthcare professionals (HCPs), patients, and other experts. Uptake of these technologies will also need education and awareness among non-specialist audiences around their optimal use as sources of plain language medical information. Plain Language Summary: More and more people are using special computer programs called artificial intelligence (AI) or large language models (LLMs) to find and get medical facts in simple words they can understand. This can help people take better care of themselves, learn about their health, and talk with their doctors. We found that AI/LLMs generally provided correct and helpful information to people. However, there could also be a risk of incorrect or unreliable information in certain situations if the question is complex. This can cause harm to people if they use this information to make their own medical decisions. Also, gAI/LLMs provide human-like responses, which make people trust them more than they should. There could be a risk that people may share their medical information with AI/LLMs, which could get into the wrong hands. To make sure these programs really help people, they need to be clear about how they work, and they must have good rules to follow and take advice from doctors and patients to improve performance. People also need to be trained on how to best use these AI tools to find easy-to-understand and reliable medical information. It is important for doctors, patients and other health workers to help make sure the AI is producing reliable and understandable medical information for patients.Keywords
This publication has 81 references indexed in Scilit:
- How AI Could Reshape Health Care—Rise in Direct-to-Consumer ModelsJAMA, 2025
- Can AI Answer My Questions? Utilizing Artificial Intelligence in the Perioperative Assessment for Abdominoplasty PatientsAesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2024
- Reliability of artificial intelligence chatbot responses to frequently asked questions in breast surgical oncologyJournal of Surgical Oncology, 2024
- Quantitative Comparison of Chatbots on Common Rhinology PathologiesThe Laryngoscope, 2024
- Incorporation of artificial intelligence in healthcare professions and patient education for fostering effective patient careNew Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2024
- AI-Generated Clinical Summaries Require More Than AccuracyJAMA, 2024
- Assessing the accuracy and completeness of artificial intelligence language models in providing information on methotrexate useRheumatology International, 2023
- ChatGPT and most frequent urological diseases: analysing the quality of information and potential risks for patientsWorld Journal of Urology, 2023
- Head‐to‐Head Comparison of ChatGPT Versus Google Search for Medical Knowledge AcquisitionOtolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 2023
- Appropriateness of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Recommendations Obtained From a Popular Online Chat-Based Artificial Intelligence ModelJAMA, 2023