Space invaders; biological invasions in marine conservation planning
Authors:
- Sylvaine GiakoumiSylvaine Giakoumi
- François GuilhaumonFrançois Guilhaumon
- Salit KarkSalit Kark
- Antonio TerlizziAntonio Terlizzi
- Joachim ClaudetJoachim Claudet
- Serena FellineSerena Felline
- Carlo CerranoCarlo Cerrano
- Marta CollMarta Coll
- Simonetta FraschettiSimonetta Fraschetti
- Jean‐Batiste LedouxJean‐Batiste Ledoux
- 5 October 2016
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Diversity and Distributions
- Vol. 22 (12) , 1220-1231
Abstract
Aim: Biological invasions are major contributors to global change and native biodiversity decline. However, they are overlooked in marine conservation plans. Here, we examine for the first time the extent to which marine conservation planning research has addressed (or ignored) biological invasions. Furthermore, we explore the change of spatial priorities in conservation plans when different approaches are used to incorporate the presence and impacts of invasive species.Location: Global analysis with a focus on the Mediterranean Sea region.Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review consisting of three steps: (1) article selection using a search engine, (2) abstract screening and (3) review of pertinent articles, which were identified in the second step. The information extracted included the scale and geographical location of each case study as well as the approach followed regarding invasive species. We also applied the softwareMarxanto produce and compare conservation plans for the Mediterranean Sea that either protect, or avoid areas impacted by invasives, or ignore the issue. One case study focused on the protection of critical habitats, and the other on endemic fish species.Results: We found that of 119 papers on marine spatial plans in specific biogeographic regions, only three (2.5%) explicitly took into account invasive species. When comparing the different conservation plans for each case study, we found that the majority of selected sites for protection (ca. 80%) changed in the critical habitat case study, while this proportion was lower but substantial (27%) in the endemic fish species case study.Main conclusions: Biological invasions are being widely disregarded when planning for conservation in the marine environment across local to global scales. More explicit consideration of biological invasions can significantly alter spatial conservation priorities. Future conservation plans should explicitly account for biological invasions to optimize the selection of marine protected areas.Keywords
Funding Information
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche
- Australian Research Council
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BPD/74400/2010)
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cumulative Human Impacts on Mediterranean and Black Sea Marine Ecosystems: Assessing Current Pressures and OpportunitiesPLOS ONE, 2013
- Ecoregion-Based Conservation Planning in the Mediterranean: Dealing with Large-Scale HeterogeneityPLOS ONE, 2013
- Setting Priorities for Regional Conservation Planning in the Mediterranean SeaPLOS ONE, 2013
- Grouper as a Natural Biocontrol of Invasive LionfishPLOS ONE, 2011
- Designing a network of marine reserves in the Mediterranean Sea with limited socio-economic dataBiological Conservation, 2011
- Invasive Species, Environmental Change and Management, and HealthAnnual Review of Environment and Resources, 2010
- Between-country collaboration and consideration of costs increase conservation planning efficiency in the Mediterranean BasinProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- Species Richness and Patterns of Invasion in Plants, Birds, and Fishes in the United States*Biological Invasions, 2006
- California’s Reaction to Caulerpa taxifolia: A Model for Invasive Species Rapid Response*Biological Invasions, 2005
- Marine invasive alien species: a threat to global biodiversityMarine Policy, 2003