Identifying indicators of apple bud dormancy status by exposure to artificial forcing conditions
Open Access
- 31 August 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Tree Physiology
- Vol. 44 (10)
Abstract
Dormancy in temperate fruit trees is a mechanism of temporary growth suspension, which is vital for tree survival during winter. Studies on this phenomenon frequently employ scientific methods that aim to detect the timing of dormancy release. Dormancy release occurs when trees have been exposed to sufficient chill, allowing them to resume growth under conducive conditions. This study investigates dormancy dynamics in two apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) cultivars, ‘Nicoter’ and ‘Topaz’, by sampling branches in an orchard over 14 weeks (2019–2020) and over 31 weeks (2021–2022) and subjecting them to a 42-day budbreak forcing period in a growth chamber. Temporal changes in budbreak percentages demonstrated dormancy progression in the studied apple cultivars and allowed distinguishing the three main dormancy phases: paradormancy (summer dormancy), endodormancy (deep dormancy), and ecodormancy (spring dormancy), along with transition periods between them. Using these data, we explored the suitability of several alternative methods to determine endodormancy release. Tabuenca’s test, which predicts dormancy release based on the differences in dry weights of buds with and without forcing, showed promise for this purpose. However, our data indicated a need for considerable adjustments and validation of this test. Bud weight and water content of buds in the orchard did not align with budbreak percentages under forcing conditions, rendering them unsuitable for determining endodormancy release in ‘Nicoter’ and ‘Topaz’. Shoot growth cessation did not seem to be connected with either dormancy progression or dormancy depth of the studied cultivars, whereas leaf fall coincided with the beginning of the transition from endo- to ecodormancy. This work addresses methodological limitations in dormancy research and suggests considering the mean time to budbreak and budbreak synchrony as additional criteria to assess tree dormancy status.Keywords
Funding Information
- Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Bonn
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Advances in virus-induced flowering in tomatoJournal of Experimental Botany, 2023
- The MADS-Box Gene MdDAM1 Controls Growth Cessation and Bud Dormancy in AppleFrontiers in Plant Science, 2020
- Insights Into Oxidized Lipid Modification in Barley Roots as an Adaptation Mechanism to Salinity StressFrontiers in Plant Science, 2020
- Yield potential definition of the chilling requirement reveals likely underestimation of the risk of climate change on winter chill accumulationInternational Journal of Biometeorology, 2018
- Bud Dormancy in Perennial Fruit Tree Species: A Pivotal Role for Oxidative CuesFrontiers in Plant Science, 2018
- Metarhizium brunneum (Ascomycota; Hypocreales) Treatments Targeting Olive Fly in the Soil for Sustainable Crop ProductionFrontiers in Plant Science, 2018
- Changes in carbohydrate levels and relative water content (RWC) to distinguish dormancy phases in sweet cherryJournal of Plant Physiology, 2017
- Differentiated dynamics of bud dormancy and growth in temperate fruit trees relating to bud phenology adaptation, the case of apple and almond treesInternational Journal of Biometeorology, 2016
- Temperature-driven plasticity in growth cessation and dormancy development in deciduous woody plants: a working hypothesis suggesting how molecular and cellular function is affected by temperature during dormancy inductionPlant Molecular Biology, 2010
- Low temperature, but not photoperiod, controls growth cessation and dormancy induction and release in apple and pearTree Physiology, 2005