Improving Food and Drug Administration–Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Coordination for Drugs Granted Accelerated Approval
Authors:
- 29 August 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Milbank Quarterly
- Vol. 101 (4) , 1047-1075
Abstract
Context: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s accelerated-approval pathway expedites patient access to promising treatments. However, increasing use of this pathway has challenged the Medicare program, which often pays for expensive therapies despite substantial uncertainty about benefits and risks to Medicare beneficiaries. We examined approaches to improve coordination between the FDA and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for drugs granted accelerated approval.Methods: We argue that policymakers have focused on expedited pathways at the FDA without sufficient attention to complementary policies at the CMS. Although differences between the FDA and CMS decisions are to be expected given the agencies' different missions and statutory obligations, procedural improvements can ensure that Medicare beneficiaries have timely access to novel therapies that are likely to improve health outcomes. To inform policy options and recommendations, we conducted semistructured interviews with stakeholders to capture diverse perspectives on the topic.Findings: We recommend ten areas for consideration: clarifying the FDA's evidentiary standards; strengthening FDA authorities; promoting earlier discussions among the FDA, the CMS, and drug companies; improving Medicare's coverage with evidence development program; tying Medicare payment for accelerated-approval drugs to evidence generation milestones; issuing CMS guidance on real-world evidence; clarifying Medicare's "reasonable and necessary" criteria; adopting lessons from international regulatory-reimbursement harmonization efforts; ensuring that the CMS has adequate staffing and expertise; and emphasizing equity.Conclusions: Better coordination between the FDA and CMS could improve the transparency and predictability of drug approval and coverage around accelerated-approval drugs, with important implications for patient outcomes, health spending, and evidence generation processes. Improved coordination will require reforms at both the FDA and CMS, with special attention to honoring the agencies' distinct authorities. It will require administrative and legislative actions, new resources, and strong leadership at both agencies.Keywords
Funding Information
- Arnold Ventures (22‐07016)
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of Health Care Databases to Support Supplemental Indications of Approved MedicationsJAMA Internal Medicine, 2018
- When and How Can Real World Data Analyses Substitute for Randomized Controlled Trials?Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2017
- Good Practices for Real‐World Data Studies of Treatment and/or Comparative Effectiveness: Recommendations from the Joint ISPOR‐ISPE Special Task Force on Real‐World Evidence in Health Care Decision MakingValue in Health, 2017
- Characteristics of Preapproval and Postapproval Studies for Drugs Granted Accelerated Approval by the US Food and Drug AdministrationJAMA, 2017
- Conflicts of Interest for Patient-Advocacy OrganizationsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2017
- Patient Advocacy Organizations, Industry Funding, and Conflicts of InterestJAMA Internal Medicine, 2017
- Accelerated Drug Approval and Health InequalityJAMA Internal Medicine, 2016
- CHANGING FACE OF MEDICARE’S NATIONAL COVERAGE DETERMINATIONS FOR TECHNOLOGYInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2015
- Medicare's Enduring Struggle to Define “Reasonable and Necessary” CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Medicare and Medical Technology — The Growing Demand for Relevant OutcomesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010