Neurally adjusted ventilator assist (NAVA) reduces asynchrony during non-invasive ventilation for severe bronchiolitis
- 8 December 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pediatric Pulmonology
- Vol. 50 (12) , 1320-1327
Abstract
To determine the prevalence of main inspiratory asynchrony events during non-invasive intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (NIV) for severe bronchiolitis. Ventilator response time and asynchrony were compared in neurally adjusted ventilator assist (NAVA) and in pressure assist/control (PAC) modes. This prospective physiological study was performed in a university hospital's paediatric intensive care unit and included 11 children (aged 35.2 ± 23 days) with respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis with failure of nCPAP. Patients received NIV for 2 hr in PAC mode followed by 2 hr in NAVA mode. Electrical activity of the diaphragm and pressure curves were recorded for 10 min. Trigger delay, main asynchronies (auto-triggering, double triggering, or non-triggered breaths) were analyzed, and the asynchrony index was calculated for each period. The asynchrony index was lower during NAVA than during PAC (3 ± 3% vs. 38 ± 21%, P < 0.0001), and the trigger delay was shorter (43.9 ± 7.2 vs. 116.0 ± 38.9 ms, P < 0.0001). Ineffective efforts were significantly less frequent in NAVA mode (0.54 ± 1.5 vs. 21.8 ± 16.5 events/min, P = 0.01). Patient respiratory rates were similar, but the ventilator rate was higher in NAVA than in PAC mode (59.5 ± 17.9 vs. 49.8 ± 8.5/min, P = 0.03). The TcPCO2 baselines values (64 ± 12 mmHg vs. 62 ± 9 mmHg during NAVA, P = 0.30) were the same and their evolution over the 2 hr study period (-6 ± 10 mmHg vs. -12 ± 17 mmHg during NAVA, P = 0.36) did not differ. Patient-ventilator inspiratory asynchronies and trigger delay were dramatically lower in NAVA mode than in PAC mode during NIV in infants with severe bronchiolitis.Keywords
Funding Information
- Association Générale de l'internat de Lyon
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Infants with severe respiratory syncytial virus needed less ventilator time with nasal continuous airways pressure then invasive mechanical ventilationActa Paediatrica, 2013
- Improved clinical and economic outcomes in severe bronchiolitis with pre-emptive nCPAP ventilatory strategyIntensive Care Medicine, 2013
- 6 cmH2O continuous positive airway pressure versus conventional oxygen therapy in severe viral bronchiolitis: A randomized trialPediatric Pulmonology, 2012
- Optimal level of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in severe viral bronchiolitisIntensive Care Medicine, 2011
- Global burden of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in young children: a systematic review and meta-analysisThe Lancet, 2010
- Nasal continuous positive airway pressure decreases respiratory muscles overload in young infants with severe acute viral bronchiolitisIntensive Care Medicine, 2008
- Non-invasive ventilation as primary ventilatory support for infants with severe bronchiolitisIntensive Care Medicine, 2008
- Randomised controlled trial of nasal continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) in bronchiolitisArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2008
- BronchiolitisThe Lancet, 2006
- Predicting Deterioration in Previously Healthy Infants Hospitalized With Respiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionPediatrics, 1999