Effects of Virtual Reality versus Exercise on Pain, Functional, Somatosensory and Psychosocial Outcomes in Patients with Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Authors:
- David Morales TejeraDTDavid Morales Tejera
- Hector Beltran-AlacreuHBHector Beltran-Alacreu
- Roberto Cano-De-La-CuerdaRoberto Cano-De-La-Cuerda
- Jose Vicente Leon HernándezJHJose Vicente Leon Hernández
- Aitor Martín-Pintado-ZugastiAMAitor Martín-Pintado-Zugasti
- César Calvo-LoboCésar Calvo-Lobo
- Alfonso Gil-MartínezAGAlfonso Gil-Martínez
- Josué Fernández-CarneroJosué Fernández-Carnero
Open Access
- 16 August 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 17 (16) , 5950
Abstract
Background: Virtual reality (VR) applied to patients with neck pain is a promising intervention to produce positive effects when used alone or combined with exercise. Therefore, the objective of this manuscript is to compare the effects of VR versus exercise treatment on pain intensity, conditioned pain modulation (CPM), temporal summation (TS) and functional and somatosensory outcomes in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain (NS-CNP). Methods: A single-blinded, randomized clinical trial was carried out. A total sample of 44 patients with NS-CNP was randomized into a VR treatment group or neck exercises group. The intervention consisted of two treatment sessions per week, for four weeks and eight sessions. Four measurement moments (at baseline, immediately, 1 month, and 3 months after intervention) were considered. Pain intensity, CPM, TS, functional and somatosensory outcomes were measured. Results: Statistically significant differences were revealed for time factor (F = 16.40, p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.28) and group*time interaction for kinesiophobia (F = 3.89, p = 0.01, ηp2 = 0.08) showing post-hoc differences in favor of the VR group at 3 months (p < 0.05, d = 0.65). Significant effects were shown for time factor (p < 0.05) but not for the group*time interaction (p > 0.05) for pain intensity, rotation range of motion (ROM), Neck Disability Index, pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance beliefs, left side pressure pain threshold (PPT) and anxiety. Statistically significant differences were not found for time factor (p > 0.05) and neither in group*time interaction (p > 0.05) for CPM, TS, right side PPT, flexo-extension and lateral-flexion ROM. Conclusions: Kinesiophobia was the only outcome that showed differences between VR and exercise at 3 months. Nevertheless, pain intensity, CPM, TS, ROM, neck disability, pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance beliefs, PPT and anxiety did not show differences between both interventions.Keywords
This publication has 74 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fear and Avoidance of Movement in People with Chronic Pain: Psychometric Properties of the 11-Item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11)Physiotherapy Canada, 2012
- Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK)The Journal of Pain, 2011
- Findings From The Bone and Joint Decade 2000 to 2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated DisordersJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2010
- The Neck Disability Index: State-of-the-Art, 1991-2008Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 2008
- Randomised trial of trigger point acupuncture compared with other acupuncture for treatment of chronic neck painComplementary Therapies in Medicine, 2007
- The Neurobiology of Virtual Reality Pain AttenuationCyberPsychology & Behavior, 2007
- The Fear-Avoidance Model of Musculoskeletal Pain: Current State of Scientific EvidenceJournal of Behavioral Medicine, 2006
- Clinically Important Change in the Visual Analog Scale after Adequate Pain ControlAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2003
- Psychological and neural mechanisms of pain, By Donald D. Price; Raven Press, 1988, 253 ppSynapse, 1989
- The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental painPain, 1983