Linguistic Information in Auditory Dynamic Events Contributes to the Detection of Fine, Not Coarse Event Boundaries
Authors:
- Frank PapenmeierFPFrank Papenmeier
- Annika E. MaurerAMAnnika E. Maurer
- Markus HuffMHMarkus Huff
Open Access
- 1 March 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw in Advances in Cognitive Psychology
- Vol. 15 (1) , 30-40
Abstract
Human observers (comprehenders) segment dynamic information into discrete events. That is, although there is continuous sensory information, comprehenders perceive boundaries between two meaningful units of information. In narrative comprehension, comprehenders use linguistic, non-linguistic , and physical cues for this event boundary perception. Yet, it is an open question – both from a theoretical and an empirical perspective – how linguistic and non-linguistic cues contribute to this process. The current study explores how linguistic cues contribute to the participants’ ability to segment continuous auditory information into discrete, hierarchically structured events. Native speakers of German and non-native speakers, who neither spoke nor understood German, segmented a German audio drama into coarse and fine events. Whereas native participants could make use of linguistic, non-linguistic, and physical cues for segmentation, non-native participants could only use non-linguistic and physical cues. We analyzed segmentation behavior in terms of the ability to identify coarse and fine event boundaries and the resulting hierarchical structure. Non-native listeners identified almost identical coarse event boundaries as native listeners, but missed some of the fine event boundaries identified by the native listeners. Interestingly, hierarchical event perception (as measured by hierarchical alignment and enclosure) was comparable for native and non-native participants. In summary, linguistic cues contributed particularly to the identification of certain fine event boundaries. The results are discussed with regard to the current theories of event cognition.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Event segmentation in a visual language: Neural bases of processing American Sign Language predicatesNeuroImage, 2012
- The Impact of Continuity Editing in Narrative Film on Event SegmentationCognitive Science, 2011
- Event perceptionWIREs Cognitive Science, 2010
- Asymmetric cultural effects on perceptual expertise underlie an own-race bias for voicesCognition, 2010
- Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2009
- Neural Dynamics of Event Segmentation in Music: Converging Evidence for Dissociable Ventral and Dorsal NetworksNeuron, 2007
- PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in PythonJournal of Neuroscience Methods, 2007
- Event perception: A mind-brain perspective.Psychological Bulletin, 2007
- Learning to recognize speakers of a non-native language: Implications for the functional organization of human auditory cortexNeuropsychologia, 2007
- Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European originNature, 2003