Disentangling Dose and Radiation Quality Effects on Late DNA Damage Response in Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells
Authors:
- Sofia A. KornevaSKSofia A. Korneva
- Alexander P. ChernyaevACAlexander P. Chernyaev
- Oleg V. BelovOBOleg V. Belov
- Anna ChigasovaACAnna Chigasova
- Andrey А. OsipovAOAndrey А. Osipov
- Maxim IgnatovMIMaxim Ignatov
- Elizaveta YashkinaEYElizaveta Yashkina
- Vyacheslav SaburovVSVyacheslav Saburov
- Natalia VorobyevaNVNatalia Vorobyeva
- Nikolay ZyuzikovNZNikolay Zyuzikov
- Andreyan N. OsipovAOAndreyan N. Osipov
Open Access
- 22 October 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Vol. 27 (21) , 9423
Abstract
Although ionizing radiation quality shapes the spatial structure and complexity of primary DNA lesions, its contribution relative to absorbed dose in the late DNA damage response (DDR) remains poorly quantified. We analyzed γH2AX and pATM foci kinetics in human mesenchymal stromal/stem cells exposed to 60Co γ-rays, 150 MeV protons, and 14.1 MeV neutrons at doses of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 Gy, delivered at dose rates of 0.5 Gy/min for γ-rays, 1 Gy/min for protons, and 46 mGy/min for neutrons, respectively. An effective kinetic model was used to describe the time course of the DDR and incorporated an ultraslow component as a model-based index of long-lasting repair burden. Radiation types differed less in early signal amplitude than in decay rate and late persistence. At every investigated dose, the normalized ultraslow fraction followed the order γ-rays < protons < neutrons. This ordering was preserved in per-dose fits, while parametric bootstrapping supported the γ–neutron separation, although the absolute values of the internal fractions were only partially identifiable. RAD51, analyzed independently from model fitting, showed the same qualitative ordering at late time points, supporting the interpretation that radiation quality is more associated with persistent DDR signaling than absorbed dose within the investigated range. These findings suggest that absorbed dose alone may not fully characterize the late cellular response to different radiation qualities and highlight the importance of radiation quality in comparative radiobiology, radiation protection, and the interpretation of normal-tissue responses to therapeutic irradiation.Keywords
Funding Information
- Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (FFZE-2025-0030)
- Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (1024122500008-3)
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting DNA damage foci and their experimental readout with 2D microscopy: a unified approach applied to photon and neutron exposuresScientific Reports, 2019
- The Radiation Resistance of Human Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Is Independent of Their Tissue of OriginInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP), 2018
- Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Irradiation Interferes with the Adipogenic/Osteogenic Differentiation Balance and Improves Their Hematopoietic-Supporting AbilityTransplantation and Cellular Therapy, 2018
- ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: The Trinity at the Heart of the DNA Damage ResponseMolecular Cell, 2017
- Biochemical DSB-repair model for mammalian cells in G1 and early S phases of the cell cycleMutation Research - Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, 2013
- The ATM protein kinase: regulating the cellular response to genotoxic stress, and moreNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2013
- More than just a focus: The chromatin response to DNA damage and its role in genome integrity maintenanceNature Cell Biology, 2011
- The DNA-damage response in human biology and diseaseNature, 2009
- DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociationNature, 2003
- DNA Damage Produced by Ionizing Radiation in Mammalian Cells: Identities, Mechanisms of Formation, and Reparability1988