Preoperative and Intraoperative Localization of Small Pulmonary Nodules for Sublobar Resection: Practical Insights into Percutaneous, Bronchoscopic/Robotic, RFID (SuReFInD), and Hybrid-OR CT Workflows
Authors:
- Kanji TanakaKTKanji Tanaka
- Masaru TakenakaMTMasaru Takenaka
- Daikichi MeguroDMDaikichi Meguro
- Nobuyuki TakeNTNobuyuki Take
- Teppei HashimotoTHTeppei Hashimoto
- Yasuhiro FujitaYFYasuhiro Fujita
- Takehiko ManabeTMTakehiko Manabe
- Katsuma YoshimatsuKYKatsuma Yoshimatsu
- Hiroki MatsumiyaHMHiroki Matsumiya
- Masataka MoriMMMasataka Mori
- Asahi NagataANAsahi Nagata
- Hidetaka UramotoHUHidetaka Uramoto
Open Access
Abstract
Thin-slice high-resolution computed tomography (CT) has improved the detection of small pulmonary nodules, increasing the demand for minimally invasive diagnostic and therapeutic resection. While lobectomy with lymph node dissection remains the standard surgical approach for many patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer, accumulating evidence supports sublobar resection for selected small, peripheral, and ground-glass-dominant lesions when sufficient margins are achievable. In thoracoscopic and robotic surgery, localization of nodules ≤10 mm or lesions located >5 mm from the pleural surface can be challenging, and failure to identify the target may lead to conversion, larger resection than intended, or prolonged operative time. Several localization strategies have been developed, including CT-guided percutaneous wire/coil/dye marking, bronchoscopic dye mapping, and virtual-assisted lung mapping (VAL-MAP), robotic-assisted bronchoscopic dye or fiducial localization, radiofrequency identification microtag systems (Surgical Real-Time FInger Navigation and Detection) that provide real-time depth information, and single-stage intraoperative CT-guided marking and resection in hybrid operating rooms. This review synthesizes representative evidence and published outcome ranges, and compares workflows, marker-to-lesion precision metrics, complication profiles, operational burden, and cost structures. We emphasize the practical contrast between two-stage and single-stage workflows, the access-route differences between transthoracic and transbronchial techniques, and the need to report localization-to-incision “time at risk”. We also present an expert-consensus decision algorithm aimed at facilitating tailored selection of localization strategies for modern minimally invasive thoracic surgery.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of radiofrequency identification tag accuracy using bronchoscopy with fluoroscopy and virtual navigation guidance before segmentectomySurgical Endoscopy, 2024
- Evaluation of the radiofrequency identification lung marking system: a multicenter study in JapanSurgical Endoscopy, 2023
- Incidence, risk factors, and prognostic indicators of symptomatic air embolism after percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy: a systematic review and pooled analysisEuropean Radiology, 2020
- Reimbursement pricing for new medical devices in Japan: Is the evaluation of innovation appropriate?The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 2018
- Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Preoperative Lung Localization for Pulmonary NodulesChest, 2017
- CT fluoroscopy-guided preoperative short hook wire placement for small pulmonary lesions: evaluation of safety and identification of risk factors for pneumothoraxEuropean Radiology, 2015
- Efficacy and Complications of Computed Tomography-Guided Hook Wire LocalizationThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2013
- Systemic air embolism during preoperative pulmonary marking with a short hook wire and suture system under CT fluoroscopy guidanceJapanese Journal of Radiology, 2009
- Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thicknessEuropean Radiology, 2003
- Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancerThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1995