Generative AI detection in higher education assessments
Author:
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 3 September 2024
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in New Directions for Teaching and Learning
- Vol. 2025 (182) , 11-28
Abstract
This chapter presents a critical analysis of generative AI (GenAI) detection tools in higher education assessments. The rapid advancement and widespread adoption of GenAI, particularly in education, necessitates a reevaluation of traditional academic integrity mechanisms. I explore the effectiveness, vulnerabilities, and ethical implications of AI detection tools in the context of preserving academic integrity. My analysis synthesizes insights from various case studies, newspaper articles, and student testimonies to scrutinize the practical and philosophical challenges associated with AI detection. I argue that reliance on detection mechanisms is misaligned with the educational landscape, where AI plays an increasing role. I advocate for a strategic shift toward robust assessment methods and educational policies that embrace GenAI usage while ensuring academic integrity and authenticity in assessments.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assessment: a call to reconsider the “originality” of students’ workAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
- Continued deterioration in university student mental health: Inevitable decline or skirting around the deeper problems?Journal of Affective Disorders Reports, 2023
- Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay: Higher Education Student's PerspectiveInternational Journal of Educational Research Open, 2023
- GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writersPatterns, 2023
- Distinguishing academic science writing from humans or ChatGPT with over 99% accuracy using off-the-shelf machine learning toolsCell Reports Physical Science, 2023
- Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawedProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2023
- Artificial intelligence versus Maya Angelou: Experimental evidence that people cannot differentiate AI-generated from human-written poetryComputers in Human Behavior, 2021
- Why students engage in cyber-cheating through a collective movement: A case of deviance and collusionComputers & Education, 2018
- Student mental health: some answers and more questionsJournal of Mental Health, 2018
- Exploring university students' perceptions of plagiarism: a focus group studyStudies in Higher Education, 2010