A systematic review of the agreement between chronological age and skeletal age based on the Greulich and Pyle atlas
- 30 October 2018
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Radiology
- Vol. 29 (6) , 2936-2948
Abstract
This systematic review examines the agreement between assessed skeletal age by the Greulich and Pyle atlas (GP skeletal age) and chronological age.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patterns of linear growth and skeletal maturation from birth to 18 years of age in overweight young adultsInternational Journal of Obesity, 2011
- QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy StudiesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- Influence of Socioeconomic Status and Body Mass Index on Bone AgeHormone Research in Paediatrics, 2010
- Assessment of skeletal age using MP 3 and hand-wrist radiographs and its correlation with dental and chronological ages in childrenJournal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, 2010
- Racial Differences in Growth Patterns of Children Assessed on the Basis of Bone AgeRadiology, 2009
- Transition analysis: a new method for estimating age from skeletons2002
- Assessment of bone ages: Is the Greulich‐Pyle method sufficient for Turkish boys?Pediatrics International, 2001
- Skeletal Maturation of Wrist and Hand Ossification Centers in Normal Spanish Boys and Girls: A Study Using the Greulich-Pyle MethodCells Tissues Organs, 1996
- Reproducibility of bone ages when performed by radiology registrars: an audit of Tanner and Whitehouse II versus Greulich and Pyle methodsBritish Journal of Radiology, 1994
- Farewell to paleodemographyJournal of Human Evolution, 1982