Economists as geographers and geographers as something else: on the changing conception of distance in geography and economics
- 28 November 2010
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Economic Geography
- Vol. 11 (2) , 347-356
Abstract
In the lifetime of the Journal of Economic Geography geographers and economists have followed diverging paths to the study of the location of economic activity which, paradoxically, have resulted in very similar spatial configurations: a world dominated by large metropoli, where intermediate and peripheral spaces tend to matter less and less. These similar outcomes hide, however, different explanations and lead to different and contradictory policies. Such a situation raises both important questions and highlights the limitations of narrowly-defined disciplinary approaches, calling for a greater interaction between the two disciplines.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rethinking (New) Economic Geography Models: Taking Geography and History More SeriouslySpatial Economic Analysis, 2010
- Editorial StatementCambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2008
- Proximity and Innovation: A Critical AssessmentRegional Studies, 2005
- Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creationProgress in Human Geography, 2004
- Chapter 48 Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies2004
- Toward a relational economic geographyJournal of Economic Geography, 2003
- Spatialities of GlobalisationEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2002
- Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensionsResearch Policy, 1997
- "Being There": Proximity, Organization, and Culture in the Development and Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing TechnologiesEconomic Geography, 1995
- Stability in CompetitionThe Economic Journal, 1929