The Problem With PICO for Finding the Best Evidence: Fishing With the Wrong Bait and the SEARCH Solution
- 8 August 2023
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing
- Vol. 38 (5) , 809-812
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searchesJournal of the Medical Library Association, 2018
- The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic reviewJournal of the Medical Library Association, 2018
- Why clinical trial outcomes fail to translate into benefits for patientsTrials, 2017
- Development of a Search Strategy for an Evidence Based Retrieval ServicePLOS ONE, 2016
- PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviewsBMC Health Services Research, 2014
- Comparing patient characteristics, type of intervention, control, and outcome (PICO) queries with unguided searching: a randomized controlled crossover trialJournal of the Medical Library Association, 2012
- Formulating the Evidence Based Practice Question: A Review of the FrameworksEvidence Based Library and Information Practice, 2011
- Reliability of Noninvasive Oximetry in Black Subjects during Exercise and HypoxiaAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1991
- Reliability of Pulse Oximetry in Titrating Supplemental Oxygen Therapy in Ventilator-Dependent PatientsChest, 1990
- The current status of pulse oximetryAnaesthesia, 1986