Case‐linked analysis of clinical trial enrollment among adolescents and young adults at a National Cancer Institute‐Designated comprehensive cancer center
Open Access
- 22 September 2015
- Vol. 121 (24) , 4398-4406
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Poor accrual to cancer clinical trials may contribute to the lower improvement in survival observed for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) (those aged 15‐39 years) with cancer. This has been difficult to quantify without reliable mechanisms to link incident cases with study enrollments. Using unique resources available at their National Cancer Institute‐designated comprehensive cancer center, the authors compared the percentage of AYAs, children, and older adults enrolled onto cancer clinical trials and determined predictors of enrollment.METHODS: Patients diagnosed with cancer from January 2008 through December 2012 at 1 pediatric and 2 adult University of Southern California hospitals were identified through the California Cancer Registry and individually linked to institutional trial enrollment databases. The availability of clinical trials was assessed.RESULTS: Across the center, the enrollment percentage for AYAs (6%) was equal to that of older adults (6%), but was less than that for children (22%) (P < .01). Within the children's hospital, the AYA enrollment percentage was also less than that for children (15% vs 23%, respectively; P<.01). On multivariate analysis, diagnosis and site of care were found to be predictive of AYA enrollment onto therapeutic and nontherapeutic studies. Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander individuals were more likely to enroll onto nontherapeutic studies compared with non‐Hispanic whites, but no racial/ethnic difference was observed for therapeutic studies.CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, the percentages of AYAs and older adults enrolled onto therapeutic trials were low but similar. Diagnosis, site of care, and race/ethnicity appear to be predictive of enrollment. Prospective mechanisms must be instituted to capture reasons for nonenrollment of AYAs and develop corrective interventions. Cancer 2015;121:4398–406. © 2015 American Cancer Society.Keywords
Funding Information
- Dear Jack Foundation (to Dr. Collins)
- David Stroud Postgraduate Fellowship Fund (to Dr. Collins)
- the California Department of Public Health as part of the cancer reporting program mandated by California Health and Safety Code Section (103885)
- the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program under (HHSN261201000140C)
- Cancer Prevention Institute of California (HHSN261201000035C)
- the University of Southern California (HHSN261201000034C)
- the Public Health Institute; and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries, under agreement (U58DP003862-01)
- the California Department of Public Health
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical Trial Participation and Time to Treatment Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: Does Age at Diagnosis or Insurance Make a Difference?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2011
- Outcomes for Children and Adolescents With Cancer: Challenges for the Twenty-First CenturyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Adolescents with cancer in Italy: Entry into the national cooperative paediatric oncology group AIEOP trialsEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2009
- Rates of inclusion of teenagers and young adults in England into National Cancer Research Network clinical trials: Report from the National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) Teenage and Young Adult Clinical Studies Development GroupBritish Journal of Cancer, 2008
- Different Rates of Clinical Trial Enrollment Between Adolescents and Young Adults Aged 15 to 22 Years Old and Children Under 15 Years Old With Cancer at a Children's HospitalJournal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, 2007
- Are experimental treatments for cancer in children superior to established treatments? Observational study of randomised controlled trials by the Children's Oncology GroupBMJ, 2005
- National survival trends of young adults with sarcomaCancer, 2005
- Comparison of outcomes in cancer patients treated within and outside clinical trials: conceptual framework and structured reviewThe Lancet, 2004
- National cancer clinical trials: Children have equal access; adolescents do notJournal of Adolescent Health, 1997
- Patterns of enrollment on cooperative group studies. An analysis of trends from the Los Angeles county cancer surveillance programCancer, 1993