When applying eigenanalysis, one decision analysts make is the determination of what magnitude an eigenvector coefficient (e.g., principal component (PC) loading) must achieve to be considered as physically important. Such coefficients can be displayed on maps or in a time series or tables to gain a fuller understanding of a large array of multivariate data. Previously, such a decision on what value of loading designates a useful signal (hereafter called the loading “cutoff”) for each eigenvector has been purely subjective. The importance of selecting such a cutoff is apparent since those loading elements in the range of zero to the cutoff are ignored in the interpretation and naming of PCs since only the absolute values of loadings greater than the cutoff are physically analyzed. This research sets out to objectify the problem of best identifying the cutoff by application of matching between known correlation/covariance structures and their corresponding eigenpatterns, as this cutoff point (know... Abstract When applying eigenanalysis, one decision analysts make is the determination of what magnitude an eigenvector coefficient (e.g., principal component (PC) loading) must achieve to be considered as physically important. Such coefficients can be displayed on maps or in a time series or tables to gain a fuller understanding of a large array of multivariate data. Previously, such a decision on what value of loading designates a useful signal (hereafter called the loading “cutoff”) for each eigenvector has been purely subjective. The importance of selecting such a cutoff is apparent since those loading elements in the range of zero to the cutoff are ignored in the interpretation and naming of PCs since only the absolute values of loadings greater than the cutoff are physically analyzed. This research sets out to objectify the problem of best identifying the cutoff by application of matching between known correlation/covariance structures and their corresponding eigenpatterns, as this cutoff point (know...