The Scientific Knowledge Base of Special Education: Do We Know What We Think We Know?
Author:
- 1 June 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Exceptional Children
- Vol. 64 (4) , 493-502
Abstract
Leading scholars in special education acknowledge that the field has recently come under intense public criticism. Various defenses have been offered, including the lack of appropriate conditions under which to implement the knowledge base of special education. The nature of this knowledge base is examined, in particular the claim that special education possesses scientifically derived technologies. Specifically, a case is made that the term “science” is misused, and that the methods of empiricist science are inappropriately applied to study of special education. It is concluded that many, if not most, of the criticisms leveled at special education can be traced back to this misunderstanding of science. As a result, the field would do well to reconsider its philosophical ancestry.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Places of ChangeJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1994
- Overrepresentation of Minority Students in Special EducationThe Journal of Special Education, 1994
- Research News and comment: The Awful Reputation of Education ResearchEducational Researcher, 1993
- Purposeful Behavior as the Control of PerceptionEducational Researcher, 1992
- Cartesian Anxiety, Linguistic Communism, and Reading TextsEducational Researcher, 1992
- Learning Disabilities: A Questionable ConstructEducational Theory, 1991
- The Newtonian Mechanistic Paradigm, Special Education, and Contours of AlternativesJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
- The Art and Science of Research on TeachingRemedial and Special Education, 1987
- A Response toRemedial and Special Education, 1987
- The Study and Development of TeachingRemedial and Special Education, 1986