The Influence of Predominant Polarity and Chronotype on Lithium Response in Bipolar Disorder
Open Access
- 28 February 2025
- journal article
- Published by Selcuk University in Genel Tıp Dergisi
- Vol. 35 (1) , 110-115
Abstract
Aims: This study investigates the prevalence and clinical correlates of predominant polarity (PP)—depressive predominant polarity (DPP) and manic predominant polarity (MPP)—in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) type 1, as well as their association with chronotype and lithium response. Method: Eighty patients aged 18-65, in remission from BD type 1, participated in this cross-sectional study. In addition to sociodemographic and clinical data, remission status, lithium response levels, and chronotype were evaluated using the Young Mania Rating Scale, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Biological Rhythms Interview of Assessment in Neuropsychiatry, Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire, and Alda Scale. DPP and MPP were defined as a lifetime ratio of ≥2:1 of either hypomanic/manic episodes or depressive episodes, respectively. Results: The mean age of participants was 35.32 ± 11.39 years, with 61.25% being female (n=49). The dominant polarities were 46.25% (n=37) DPP and 53.75% (n=43) MPP. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of treatment types, total duration of illness, or total episode number (p>0.05). However, the onset age of the disorder was significantly earlier in the MPP group (p=0.009). This group also had significantly higher scores on the BRIAN, MEQ, and Alda Scale (t=-7.183, p=0.00; t=-3.968, p=0.00; t=-6.971, p=0.00, respectively). A weak positive correlation was found between manic episodes and BRIAN, while a strong positive correlation was observed with MEQ (respectively rs1=-0.355, rs2=-0.373). Strong positive correlations were noted between the Alda Scale and both BRIAN and MEQ, alongside strong negative correlations with the total number of depressive episodes (respectively rs1=-0.355, rs2=-0.373, rs3=-0.274). Conclusion: This cross-sectional study demonstrates that PP and chronotype significantly influence lithium response in individuals with BD-I. The MPP group was found to have an earlier onset of the disorder and exhibit more pronounced evening characteristics. Additionally, the MPP group showed a stronger response to lithium. These findings suggest that lithium may have a greater effect on individuals with MPP and evening chronotype and highlight the need for validation through larger sample sizes and longitudinal studiesKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Decreased miR-15b-5p/miR-155-5p levels and increased miR-134-5p/miR-652-3p levels among BD patients under lithium treatmentJournal of Affective Disorders, 2022
- Undetermined predominant polarity in a cohort of bipolar disorder patients: Prevalent, severe, and overlookedJournal of Affective Disorders, 2022
- Differences in the prophylactic effect of serum lithium levels on depression and mania in bipolar disorder: A dose-response meta-analysisEuropean Neuropsychopharmacology, 2022
- Sleep timing, chronotype and social jetlag: Impact on cognitive abilities and psychiatric disordersBiochemical Pharmacology, 2021
- Predominant polarity in bipolar disorder patients: The COPE bipolar sampleJournal of Affective Disorders, 2019
- Predominant polarity in bipolar disorders: Further evidence for the role of affective temperamentsJournal of Affective Disorders, 2015
- Predominant polarity as a course specifier for bipolar disorder: A systematic reviewJournal of Affective Disorders, 2014
- Polarity index of pharmacological agents used for maintenance treatment of bipolar disorderEuropean Neuropsychopharmacology, 2012
- Gender differences in a cohort study of 604 bipolar patients: The role of predominant polarityJournal of Affective Disorders, 2011
- Clinical and therapeutic implications of predominant polarity in bipolar disorderJournal of Affective Disorders, 2006