Estimating the number needed to treat from continuous outcomes in randomised controlled trials: methodological challenges and worked example using data from the UK Back Pain Exercise and Manipulation (BEAM) trial
Open Access
- 11 June 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Vol. 9 (1) , 35
Abstract
Reporting numbers needed to treat (NNT) improves interpretability of trial results. It is unusual that continuous outcomes are converted to numbers of individual responders to treatment (i.e., those who reach a particular threshold of change); and deteriorations prevented are only rarely considered. We consider how numbers needed to treat can be derived from continuous outcomes; illustrated with a worked example showing the methods and challenges.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy of antidepressantsBMJ, 2008
- Initial Severity and Antidepressant Benefits: A Meta-Analysis of Data Submitted to the Food and Drug AdministrationPLOS Medicine, 2008
- Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent EfficacyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Interpreting Change Scores for Pain and Functional Status in Low Back PainSpine, 2008
- Minimal Clinically Important Change for Pain Intensity and Disability in Patients With Nonspecific Low Back PainSpine, 2007
- Reporting of number needed to treat and its difficultiesJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2007
- Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approachQuality of Life Research, 2006
- United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in primary careBMJ, 2004
- Spinal manipulation for low-back pain: a treatment package agreed by the UK chiropractic, osteopathy and physiotherapy professional associationsManual Therapy, 2003
- A Study of the Natural History of Back PainSpine, 1983