A Comparison of Questionnaire, Accelerometer, and Pedometer
Authors:
- Tess J. HarrisTHTess J. Harris
- Christopher G. OwenCOChristopher G. Owen
- Christina R. VictorCVChristina R. Victor
- Rika AdamsRARika Adams
- Ulf EkelundUEUlf Ekelund
- Derek G. CookDCDerek G. Cook
- 1 July 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Vol. 41 (7) , 1392-1402
Abstract
To compare (i) the convergent validity of the self-report Zutphen Physical Activity Questionnaire with the 7-d objective physical activity (PA) measurement by accelerometers and pedometers and (ii) the construct validity of these measures by examining their associations with physical health and psychological and anthropometric variables. Five hundred and sixty community-dwelling people aged > or =65 yr were invited from a UK primary care practice and 238 (43%) participated (mean age = 74, 53% male). PA was assessed subjectively by the Zutphen questionnaire (modified to include housework questions) and objectively by the 7-d accelerometer monitoring: a random half also had a pedometer. A questionnaire assessed health, disability, and psychological factors, and anthropometric assessment was performed. Mean daily PA levels were as follows: Zutphen = 9.1 kcal x kg(-1) x d(-1) (SD = 6.6 kcal x kg(-1) x d(-1)); accelerometer activity count = 226,648 (SD = 121,966); accelerometer step count = 6495 (SD = 3212); and pedometer step count = 6712 (SD = 3526). Zutphen score was moderately correlated with accelerometer activity count (R = 0.34, P < 0.001) and pedometer step count (R = 0.36, P < 0.001). Pedometer step count was highly correlated with accelerometer activity count (R = 0.82, P< 0.001) and accelerometer step count (R = 0.86, P < 0.001). Objective PA measures showed strong associations with health and anthropometric and psychological variables. Zutphen score was not significantly related to most health or anthropometric measures but was associated with psychological variables and provided information about activity type. Convergent validity was strong between accelerometers and pedometers but weaker between these and self-report Zutphen. Pedometers may be preferred to accelerometers for simple studies due to their lower cost. Objective measures had better construct validity, being more strongly associated with established PA determinants, and thus offered better value to researchers than the questionnaire, but the latter provided useful detail on activity type, so a combined approach to PA assessment may be preferable.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimising recruitment into a study of physical activity in older people: a randomised controlled trial of different approachesAge and Ageing, 2008
- Hierarchy of individual calibration levels for heart rate and accelerometry to measure physical activityJournal of Applied Physiology, 2007
- Disparity between Physical Capacity and Participation in Seniors with Chronic DiseaseMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2007
- Spring-Levered versus Piezo-Electric Pedometer Accuracy in Overweight and Obese AdultsMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2005
- Pedometer Accuracy in Nursing Home and Community-Dwelling Older AdultsMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2004
- The validity of the Computer Science and Applications activity monitor for use in coronary artery disease patients during level walkingClinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, 2002
- An evaluation of three self-report physical activity instruments for older adultsMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2001
- Recruitment of Older Adults for a Randomized, Controlled Trial of Exercise Advice in a General Practice SettingJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1999
- Screening, Detection and Management of Depression in Elderly Primary Care Attenders. I: The Acceptability and Performance of the 15 Item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS15) and the Development of Short VersionsFamily Practice, 1994
- The Prevalence of Selected Physical Activities and Their Relation with Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors in Elderly Men: The Zutphen Study, 1985American Journal of Epidemiology, 1991